Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2019 21:29:33 GMT -5
Seriously: think about what you are suggesting, dude (plus you are responding to a post from a well-discredited SU 'follower' [rofl])! Stanford-haters would love that, eh? You are probably right. But Hambly did move Bartsch her senior year from RS to LS when McMahan came to team. Not the same, I know. But, I do think Plummer can play amazingly well at both pins. I like McClure and hope she is on the court. I have not seen Kipp so just responded to people who are saying "she should be on the court" Sincerely, here is the deal: So many SU-haters put out these wild, cockamamie false projections just to 'stir the pot'. Others seem to be transfixed by the newest, shiniest and most alluring "new toys" (recruits) coming under the tree for Christmas, so to speak. Old wisdom: if it ain't broke; no need for repairs! We'll see the new players 2020. *Addendum* -- afa Kipp making the starting lineup? Kevin's no dummy; if Kendall is That Good, he will figure out a way to maximize her being on the team. Guaranteed!
|
|
|
Post by vbfanantic on May 6, 2019 21:47:15 GMT -5
You are probably right. But Hambly did move Bartsch her senior year from RS to LS when McMahan came to team. Not the same, I know. But, I do think Plummer can play amazingly well at both pins. I like McClure and hope she is on the court. I have not seen Kipp so just responded to people who are saying "she should be on the court" Sincerely, here's the deal: So many SU-haters put out these wild, cockamamie false projections just to 'stir the pot'. Others seem to be transfixed by the newest, shiniest and most alluring "new toys" (recruits) coming under the tree for Christmas, so to speak. Old wisdom: if it ain't broke; no need for repairs! We'll see the new players 2020. *Addendum* -- afa Kipp making the starting lineup? Kevin's no dummy; if Kendall is That Good, he will figure out a way to maximize her being on the team. Guaranteed! As an FYI, I really like Stanford. They may be my favorite. Maybe tied with Minny or Illinois. So, don't count me as a hater. I wouldn't call my comment stirring the pot. I doubt Kevin reads VolleyTalk and he does he would not care what I wrote anyway. It is a blessing to have the kind of talent of Stanford and fun to think about how many different ways they could utilize it. They are going to be fun to watch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2019 21:53:41 GMT -5
Sincerely, here's the deal: So many SU-haters put out these wild, cockamamie false projections just to 'stir the pot'. Others seem to be transfixed by the newest, shiniest and most alluring "new toys" (recruits) coming under the tree for Christmas, so to speak. Old wisdom: if it ain't broke; no need for repairs! We'll see the new players 2020. *Addendum* -- afa Kipp making the starting lineup? Kevin's no dummy; if Kendall is That Good, he will figure out a way to maximize her being on the team. Guaranteed! As an FYI, I really like Stanford. They may be my favorite. Maybe tied with Minny or Illinois. So, don't count me as a hater. I wouldn't call my comment stirring the pot. I doubt Kevin reads VolleyTalk and he does he would not care what I wrote anyway. It is a blessing to have the kind of talent of Stanford and fun to think about how many different ways they could utilize it. They are going to be fun to watch. Nononononono - was NOT referring to you at All. I've been on VT for ~1 1/2 years now. As a former player/AC/Stanford grad-alum, I naively believed some trolls, at first.
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on May 6, 2019 22:08:03 GMT -5
Some people will never get over it. Sorry if I hurstbourne anyone with my posts in the Stanford thread. I still haven’t been proven wrong so “discredited is such an word to use. Not even an ounce of Information that has contradicted. It’s crazy how I have repeatedly pointed out that posters say it’s false with no proof, the only response I get is “ you want attention blah blah blah”. Prove. Me . Wrong. Backup your posts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2019 22:49:51 GMT -5
I was kinda hoping for good discussion on this thread vs. fanboys naming all six starters from their teams' projected 2019 rosters... C'mon y'all. Iosia? Powell? EVERY Nebraska player??
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on May 6, 2019 23:10:32 GMT -5
Some people will never get over it. Sorry if I hurstbourne anyone with my posts in the Stanford thread. I still haven’t been proven wrong so “discredited is such an word to use. Not even an ounce of Information that has contradicted. It’s crazy how I have repeatedly pointed out that posters say it’s false with no proof, the only response I get is “ you want attention blah blah blah”. Prove. Me . Wrong. Backup your posts. Omg. Sister you need to chill and move on
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on May 6, 2019 23:33:50 GMT -5
Some people will never get over it. Sorry if I hurstbourne anyone with my posts in the Stanford thread. I still haven’t been proven wrong so “discredited is such an word to use. Not even an ounce of Information that has contradicted. It’s crazy how I have repeatedly pointed out that posters say it’s false with no proof, the only response I get is “ you want attention blah blah blah”. Prove. Me . Wrong. Backup your posts. Omg. Sister you need to chill and move on My point exactly. Prove me wrong or make a valid argument or stop quoting me and posting ab me.
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on May 6, 2019 23:46:29 GMT -5
Omg. Sister you need to chill and move on My point exactly. Prove me wrong or make a valid argument or stop quoting me and posting ab me. Hunty like I said in the Stanford thread learn how to read. I’m not going to repeat what I already said bc you are too stubborn to move on
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on May 6, 2019 23:51:10 GMT -5
My point exactly. Prove me wrong or make a valid argument or stop quoting me and posting ab me. Hunty like I said in the Stanford thread learn how to read. I’m not going to repeat what I already said bc you are too stubborn to move on I read everything you said, but calling something fake or attention seeking rumor is the wrong way to phrase what you want to say. If ur calling it fake, that means you’re saying I’m lying and it’s not true. Back up what you say or choose different words please. It would save the confusion. Come at me with a valid argument instead of calling my “hunty” and “sister”, then we can have a remotely educated discussion!
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on May 7, 2019 0:02:22 GMT -5
Hunty like I said in the Stanford thread learn how to read. I’m not going to repeat what I already said bc you are too stubborn to move on I read everything you said, but calling something fake or attention seeking rumor is the wrong way to phrase what you want to say. If ur calling it fake, that means you’re saying I’m lying and it’s not true. Back up what you say or choose different words please. It would save the confusion. Come at me with a valid argument instead of calling my “hunty” and “sister”, then we can have a remotely educated discussion! Omg since you insist. 1) you LIED about her being committed. She’s far from committed and you made it seem like she was decommitting and that it was some shocking big deal. Clearly not the case, and pretty wrong to make others people’s life your drama. 2) you said you cared about her privacy. That may be what you think in your head but your actions said otherwise. Should’ve just kept your mouth shut if you were being truthful. 3) “look at my insta followers!” .... sorry but you were clearly debunked on that LMAO. 4) you said you “heard” that Plummer was going to play with the “big girls” this summer. Then recently you admitted to not even knowing and jumping on the “speculation train”... but wait I’m pretty sure you started it
|
|
|
Post by vbstan123 on May 7, 2019 0:05:08 GMT -5
I read everything you said, but calling something fake or attention seeking rumor is the wrong way to phrase what you want to say. If ur calling it fake, that means you’re saying I’m lying and it’s not true. Back up what you say or choose different words please. It would save the confusion. Come at me with a valid argument instead of calling my “hunty” and “sister”, then we can have a remotely educated discussion! Omg since you insist. 1) you LIED about her being committed. She’s far from committed and you made it seem like she was decommitting and that it was some shocking big deal. Clearly not the case, and pretty wrong to make others people’s life your drama. 2) you said you cared about her privacy. That may be what you think in your head but your actions said otherwise. Should’ve just kept your mouth shut if you were being truthful. 3) “look at my insta followers!” .... sorry but you were clearly debunked on that LMAO. 4) you said you “heard” that Plummer was going to play with the “big girls” this summer. Then recently you admitted to not even knowing and jumping on the “speculation train”... but wait I’m pretty sure you started it pretty sure everyone believed miner was going to Stanford. that was not started by stanfordvb but just backed up, and many people who have talked to parents and coaches around the club have posted on vt that she "is set at stanford".
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on May 7, 2019 0:07:42 GMT -5
Omg since you insist. 1) you LIED about her being committed. She’s far from committed and you made it seem like she was decommitting and that it was some shocking big deal. Clearly not the case, and pretty wrong to make others people’s life your drama. 2) you said you cared about her privacy. That may be what you think in your head but your actions said otherwise. Should’ve just kept your mouth shut if you were being truthful. 3) “look at my insta followers!” .... sorry but you were clearly debunked on that LMAO. 4) you said you “heard” that Plummer was going to play with the “big girls” this summer. Then recently you admitted to not even knowing and jumping on the “speculation train”... but wait I’m pretty sure you started it pretty sure everyone believed miner was going to Stanford. that was not started by stanfordvb but just backed up, and many people who have talked to parents and coaches around the club have posted on vt that she "is set at stanford". That’s not the point. She is not committed or decomitting, case closed. She’s considering all options and making it seem like she was decomitting or that it was some shocking big deal is wrong to me.
|
|
|
Post by vbstan123 on May 7, 2019 0:21:32 GMT -5
pretty sure everyone believed miner was going to Stanford. that was not started by stanfordvb but just backed up, and many people who have talked to parents and coaches around the club have posted on vt that she "is set at stanford". That’s not the point. She is not committed or decomitting, case closed. She’s considering all options and making it seem like she was decomitting or that it was some shocking big deal is wrong to me. well maybe if opinions and ideas are "shocking" for you might want to find a different place to spend your time. if there is a top recruit that has waited until may in sophomore year-there is no insurance that she is going to Stanford. However, the fact that so many people have said that they have sources telling them that she is going to Stanford has put forth the idea that she indeed is going to Stanford. If you took a poll of people that are in the club circuit and actually know things (maybe a hard concept for you) 10/10 people would say she is going to Stanford- I would be money they wouldn't even say she is uncommitted! So the fact that people are coming after someone who is saying that she may b "decommitting" has nothing to do with the actual news of her looking at other places but just a motive to start beef. Even if it was the wrong word choice-no one cares. literally get over it. like chill. there is zero sense to what you are saying and the 4 pieces of "evidence" you used are about as helpful as keyboard with every key broken
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on May 7, 2019 0:29:13 GMT -5
That’s not the point. She is not committed or decomitting, case closed. She’s considering all options and making it seem like she was decomitting or that it was some shocking big deal is wrong to me. well maybe if opinions and ideas are "shocking" for you might want to find a different place to spend your time. if there is a top recruit that has waited until may in sophomore year-there is no insurance that she is going to Stanford. However, the fact that so many people have said that they have sources telling them that she is going to Stanford has put forth the idea that she indeed is going to Stanford. If you took a poll of people that are in the club circuit and actually know things (maybe a hard concept for you) 10/10 people would say she is going to Stanford- I would be money they wouldn't even say she is uncommitted! So the fact that people are coming after someone who is saying that she may b "decommitting" has nothing to do with the actual news of her looking at other places but just a motive to start beef. Even if it was the wrong word choice-no one cares. literally get over it. like chill. there is zero sense to what you are saying and the 4 pieces of "evidence" you used are about as helpful as keyboard with every key broken I find it wrong that her trying to make an educated decision was misconstrued as decomitting, a big deal as stanfordvb made it out to be, and a bad thing because of the expressed mutual interest. It’s not just the semantics, and I don’t want to continue this conversation with people who love to stir things up because of what they hear in the “club circuit”. So bye
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on May 7, 2019 0:32:48 GMT -5
I read everything you said, but calling something fake or attention seeking rumor is the wrong way to phrase what you want to say. If ur calling it fake, that means you’re saying I’m lying and it’s not true. Back up what you say or choose different words please. It would save the confusion. Come at me with a valid argument instead of calling my “hunty” and “sister”, then we can have a remotely educated discussion! Omg since you insist. 1) you LIED about her being committed. She’s far from committed and you made it seem like she was decommitting and that it was some shocking big deal. Clearly not the case, and pretty wrong to make others people’s life your drama. 2) you said you cared about her privacy. That may be what you think in your head but your actions said otherwise. Should’ve just kept your mouth shut if you were being truthful. 3) “look at my insta followers!” .... sorry but you were clearly debunked on that LMAO. 4) you said you “heard” that Plummer was going to play with the “big girls” this summer. Then recently you admitted to not even knowing and jumping on the “speculation train”... but wait I’m pretty sure you started it Stanford has “commits” that aren’t formerly signed. I stated multiple times and used quotation when I said she was “committed”. I didn’t release her name. That has been proven and you can read back through the thread if you’d like. So far you’re 0-2. I did say I heard Plummer was playing with the big girls. From volleytalk. Which is a lot of speculation on this site. I heard it from the the vnl and Stanford thread and re posted it when it was asked about. So yes, i did hear about it. 0-3. You’re losing ground quickly ! I was referring to young players in the club world as my sources, not Stanford volleyball players, that was a wrongfully implied post by Sbilo. Their are multiple SoCal 2021 volleyball club players, committed to highly touted programs themselves, who gave me information on a girl they know personally. Never once said I was followed by college players or coaches or anything of that matter. 0-4. I just swept you in a match but came back for another set because it was too fun. So maybe you’re the discredited one now ? Seeing as you have actually been proven with hard evidence (read my posts again) that none of the claims are fully true. I didn’t release her name, I never said who followed me on Instagram, I did hear ab Plummer, and I put the word committed in quotes. Goodbye now. Tell the whole truth the next time, it’s embarassing
|
|