Post by VolleyballFella on Oct 22, 2019 5:24:48 GMT -5
You should spend less time trolling particular people and more time enjoying life in more sustainable ways, but I'll take the troll as a form of flattery since you have nothing better to do. I already stated that Colorado had a violation, but you want to stomp through like a troll-baby with a double statement to me that it was a violation; something no one else has directed toward me. Funny how I simply couldn't care less what you comment on and only respond to your trolls to me (and also choose to ignore your trolls to others). I'm also always happy to amaze, and looking forward to amazing you more.
It is not what I "feel". It is what should have been. The point should have been Colorado's only because of the officiating rules (not challengeable)...which has been discussed and agreed on by many others in this forum on a separate thread (not just me); with many pages of comments on why this is fact (and why it should be or shouldn't be changed). It has nothing to do with the missed call on a violation --which occurs in matches all the time. Additionally, it has been said that the officiating body is aware of their mistake for allowing Cal to challenge something that shouldnt have been allowed.
Regardless of the refs blunders: Colorado player was in violation. If a Colorado player had hit the ball out, or foot-faulted a serve, or netted, or committed some other violation, would you still feel that Colorado deserved the point, as long as the refs messed up somehow? Or is it just this particular libero rules violation that you don't care about? Do you feel that liberos should be able to hand-set inside the 3-meter line?
All of the refs blunders occurred after the violation. If the correct call were made right away, it would have been Cal's point. I find it sad that you are so upset that the refs didn't let Colorado get away with a violation.
And I'm glad that you don't care at all about my comments. LOL
[Edit] I'm currently at work. Calling you out on your silly posts is actually more enjoyable then the other work that I'm doing.
Unfortunately I'm currently visiting someone in the hospital and don't have the luxury of sleep either right now.
I don't put as much into this forum as you do and am not concerned about your opinion of me, but you certainly can put as much effort into whatever you like. You do assume a lot though. I am not upset at all and never said Colorado "deserved" the point. I was simply stating the fact that Cal shouldn't have been allowed to challenge in a post I wrote to someone else that you replied to. Which, again, the statement I wrote on the call is a fact...not an opinion. Plain and simple. If I was outraged on some major injustice, I certainly would have written a lot more. Your argument regarding what should have happened on this call/point in the match has been shared by some others, and mine has been shared by many others as well...so I definitely know my post was not "silly" when many others have stated the same as I have. The healthy debate on this is in another "Colorado-Cal" thread...and it seemed everyone refrained from the rude direct comments toward others in the same debate that we are having now.
Additionally, I have yet to ever take the time to make a first initial reply to people with nasty or sarcastic comments ...like I noticed you have as I have perused threads over time. I do respond and defend when "attacked"...because that's what I do. Healthy debate, questioning someone on their thought process...without the snide comments...this is fine with me, and I welcome different opinions. You don't present yourself that way. That's what is sad.