|
Post by guest2 on May 2, 2017 18:50:39 GMT -5
Just saw they are the lowest seed in the qualifier. Is it fair to throw that team in the qualifier? No team has a chance against them and for women who have been struggling to make the main draw for a long time to have to face what would be a top 10 FIVB team seems unjust
|
|
|
Post by rainmaker on May 2, 2017 18:56:40 GMT -5
Other teams: "Ouch"
|
|
|
Post by crawdaddy on May 2, 2017 19:19:56 GMT -5
Just saw they are the lowest seed in the qualifier. Is it fair to throw that team in the qualifier? No team has a chance against them and for women who have been struggling to make the main draw for a long time to have to face what would be a top 10 FIVB team seems unjust I agree with this. There has to be a way to consider international finishes in seeding AVP tournaments.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2017 19:28:45 GMT -5
This team could very well win the tournament.
|
|
|
Post by donnyb on May 2, 2017 19:52:09 GMT -5
This team could very well win the tournament. If I was betting on them that's for sure
|
|
|
Post by guest2 on May 2, 2017 20:09:58 GMT -5
This team could very well win the tournament. If I was betting on them that's for sure Mine too. Nobody else in their league. (April is, but Whitney is not) When they do get in, their first match will be against the 1 seed. Day and Britt didn't really deserve a 1 seed anyway, but thats a hell of a booby prize.
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on May 2, 2017 20:20:01 GMT -5
This team could very well win the tournament. Could be. Worth noting that Salgado has only played twice in the past 18 months (two Brazilian events where she and her partner finished well back in the pack). If she's in shape and on her game, she and Pavan could certainly win. I'll be interested in seeing how they look this weekend.
|
|
|
Post by JB Southpaw on May 3, 2017 10:31:57 GMT -5
Just saw they are the lowest seed in the qualifier. Is it fair to throw that team in the qualifier? No team has a chance against them and for women who have been struggling to make the main draw for a long time to have to face what would be a top 10 FIVB team seems unjust I thought the AVP held 2 spots for wild cards, if they didn't use them, they went to more Q teams? (from 4 to 6 Q teams). this would be a good time to use one of those. Also, Pri and Aurora at Q 19 are going to upset at least 1 high Q team too.
|
|
|
Post by rainmaker on May 3, 2017 10:39:52 GMT -5
This team could very well win the tournament. Could be. Worth noting that Salgado has only played twice in the past 18 months (two Brazilian events where she and her partner finished well back in the pack). If she's in shape and on her game, she and Pavan could certainly win. I'll be interested in seeing how they look this weekend.
|
|
|
Post by rainmaker on May 3, 2017 10:44:14 GMT -5
I meant to say I believe (if they stay Q51, and all higher seeds win their in their quadrent), they will play Q14, then Q19TH, then Q3, and Q6. Then they would enter Main as Q3, play AQ3, not open up vs AQ1. I'm kinda rambling, hope this makes sense
|
|
|
Post by rainmaker on May 3, 2017 10:49:12 GMT -5
AQ2 in main draw, not 3.
|
|
|
Post by guest2 on May 3, 2017 11:09:28 GMT -5
So April/Whitney first? Not exactly a reward for April's loyalty. If Pavan is going to play all the AVPs this year I would love to see her with April
|
|
|
Post by rainmaker on May 4, 2017 19:00:25 GMT -5
Shame the math dictated they had to play Pri/Davis (Newgard).. That team would beat like 45 of the qualifiers, imo..
|
|
|
Post by ebes1099 on May 4, 2017 19:36:28 GMT -5
Did Pavan/Salgado lose to the 5'6 Lindquist sisters?!?
|
|
|
Post by haze on May 4, 2017 19:45:44 GMT -5
According to BVB they lost to Jameson and Jones, but possibly that is an error?
|
|