|
Post by TheReignman on Feb 5, 2021 16:39:16 GMT -5
With only a few programs playing 10 or so matches in totality, it was decided to not vote this past Monday
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2021 10:41:08 GMT -5
Where can you find a legit list of 2021 commits?
|
|
|
Post by ned3head on Feb 6, 2021 13:54:36 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2021 19:12:54 GMT -5
I have seen this site but have found other random sites that list commits that are not o this one. Is it all in if the school posts here?
|
|
|
Post by ned3head on Feb 6, 2021 20:39:59 GMT -5
It’s one guy doing the best he can to promote commits to D1/II/III/NAIA/JuCo.
A club, the school, or the commit themselves can reach out to him directly to get the info up.
|
|
|
Post by futurelinejudge on Feb 7, 2021 14:31:01 GMT -5
Fontbonne looks to be legit this year. 5-0 with two dominant wins over a good Mt. Union team (3-0 & 3-1) yesterday. They have a serious argument for a spot in the top 10 consideration with how many teams will be sitting out the spring season or playing extremely condensed schedules. Their match against Augustana this week might be the most intriguing D3 match of the season so far.
|
|
|
Post by futurelinejudge on Feb 7, 2021 14:36:07 GMT -5
Fontbonne looks to be legit this year. 5-0 with two dominant wins over a good Mt. Union team (3-0 & 3-1) yesterday. They have a serious argument for a spot in the top 10 consideration with how many teams will be sitting out the spring season or playing extremely condensed schedules. Their match against Augustana this week should be a telling match for Fontbonne. Follow up to this, how much consideration should the coaches poll and tournament committee give to # of matches played? I think that it shouldn't be the determining factor, but the number of matches played definitely needs to be a large consideration, especially at the start of the season. A Fontbonne team that goes 19-3 would be a lot more impressive than a 7-2 Stevenson in my book. Pressure will be on teams playing a condensed schedule to grab an auto-bid.
|
|
|
Post by futurelinejudge on Feb 7, 2021 17:07:53 GMT -5
Fontbonne looks to be legit this year. 5-0 with two dominant wins over a good Mt. Union team (3-0 & 3-1) yesterday. They have a serious argument for a spot in the top 10 consideration with how many teams will be sitting out the spring season or playing extremely condensed schedules. Their match against Augustana this week might be the most intriguing D3 match of the season so far. Just being honest here... but the Aurora-NCC and Carthage-Aurora matches were, by quite a large margin, more telling about D3 play than Fontbonne vs Augustana/Mt.Union. Missed the two Aurora matches. Agreed.
|
|
|
Post by TheReignman on Feb 8, 2021 11:01:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by d3vballer on Feb 8, 2021 12:34:33 GMT -5
Fontbonne looks to be legit this year. 5-0 with two dominant wins over a good Mt. Union team (3-0 & 3-1) yesterday. They have a serious argument for a spot in the top 10 consideration with how many teams will be sitting out the spring season or playing extremely condensed schedules. Their match against Augustana this week might be the most intriguing D3 match of the season so far. Saying Fontbonne should be in serious argument for top 10 after beating 3 teams that are in the bottom 50 is one of the worst takes I have ever heard on volleytalk. Sorry but when you're a team like Fontbonne, you have to beat a top 10 team in order to be in discussion to receive votes. And unfortunately for you, nobody on your team's schedule will be ranked this year.
|
|
|
Post by gwvb12 on Feb 8, 2021 15:10:26 GMT -5
Fontbonne looks to be legit this year. 5-0 with two dominant wins over a good Mt. Union team (3-0 & 3-1) yesterday. They have a serious argument for a spot in the top 10 consideration with how many teams will be sitting out the spring season or playing extremely condensed schedules. Their match against Augustana this week might be the most intriguing D3 match of the season so far. Saying Fontbonne should be in serious argument for top 10 after beating 3 teams that are in the bottom 50 is one of the worst takes I have ever heard on volleytalk. Sorry but when you're a team like Fontbonne, you have to beat a top 10 team in order to be in discussion to receive votes. And unfortunately for you, nobody on your team's schedule will be ranked this year. Definitely don't think Fontbonne should be in the top 10 by any means, but saying Mount Union is in the bottom 50 is a pretty bad take as well.
|
|
|
Post by orangecurtain on Feb 8, 2021 15:45:52 GMT -5
Which conference will be the next to announce a schedule?
|
|
|
Post by TheReignman on Feb 8, 2021 16:59:02 GMT -5
Which conference will be the next to announce a schedule? I don't think CVC is making a formal announcement. CSAC made a general spring sport announcement today as well. If you are looking for a full schedule I would put money on NECC/GNAC. Think we could be waiting some time for UVC to announce conference schedule
|
|
|
Post by d3vballer on Feb 8, 2021 18:35:10 GMT -5
Saying Fontbonne should be in serious argument for top 10 after beating 3 teams that are in the bottom 50 is one of the worst takes I have ever heard on volleytalk. Sorry but when you're a team like Fontbonne, you have to beat a top 10 team in order to be in discussion to receive votes. And unfortunately for you, nobody on your team's schedule will be ranked this year. Definitely don't think Fontbonne should be in the top 10 by any means, but saying Mount Union is in the bottom 50 is a pretty bad take as well. Ok I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say bottom 75. They're not in the top 25% of teams.
|
|
|
Post by thelionking on Feb 9, 2021 10:40:41 GMT -5
Which conference will be the next to announce a schedule? 9 matches showed up on the Rutgers-Newark website today. 6 of them vs. Juniata and Kean.
|
|