|
Post by mikegarrison on Dec 2, 2022 20:21:52 GMT -5
if a player lands on an opposing player's foot that was across the center line but not caught/called by the officials, can that be challenged? I can see not allowing non-contact center line violations to be reviewable, as there is an element of a judgement call as to whether it affected any opposing players or not. But if there was contact.... I'm guessing you mean under NCAA rules? 18.1.4 Reviewable Decisions The following decisions may be reviewed: 18.1.4.1 Ball ruled in or out, as defined in Rule 16.2.1 and Rule 16.2.2, whether the ball contacted a player and whether a player touched the net or antenna; 18.1.4.2 Whether a team may have had four or more ball contacts before returning to the opponents’ court; 18.1.4.3 Whether a player may have contacted the ball twice, in two separate and distinct attempts to play the ball; 18.1.4.4 A decision on an illegal attack, illegal block or illegally contacting the ball over the opponent’s court is challengeable only if the decision is dependent on whether there was contact by an involved player. The position and/or height of the ball or a player are not challengeable. 18.1.4.5 Whether a service foot fault occurred, as defined in Rule 13.2.2.1.1; 18.1.4.6 Whether a back-row player was an illegal attacker as defined in Rule 14.5.4.2.1. 18.1.4.7 Whether the libero’s foot/feet or take-off point is in the front zone when they set the ball to a teammate as defined by Rule 12.1.2.4. Crossing the center line is not on that list.
|
|
|
Post by jayj79 on Dec 5, 2022 18:46:08 GMT -5
what does a "blocking error" in the box score represent? Is it when a blocker is called for being in the net? Or is it when an attacker "tools" the block, hitting the hands of the blocker and sending the ball out of the court?
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Dec 5, 2022 18:49:37 GMT -5
what does a "blocking error" in the box score represent? Is it when a blocker is called for being in the net? Or is it when an attacker "tools" the block, hitting the hands of the blocker and sending the ball out of the court? Net. Also being a backrow blocker is a blocking error, I think. And any other illegal blocking action. But getting tooled is not a blocking error.
|
|
|
Post by jayj79 on Dec 5, 2022 18:58:05 GMT -5
what does a "blocking error" in the box score represent? Is it when a blocker is called for being in the net? Or is it when an attacker "tools" the block, hitting the hands of the blocker and sending the ball out of the court? Net. that's what I thought, but I just heard an announcer referring to a tool as a "blocking error". But then, announcers making mistakes when calling vb matches aren't exactly a rarity.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Dec 5, 2022 19:03:47 GMT -5
that's what I thought, but I just heard an announcer referring to a tool as a "blocking error". But then, announcers making mistakes when calling vb matches aren't exactly a rarity. Well, it could be a blocking mistake without being a "blocking error" in the stat sheet. But for the stat sheet I think the reasoning is that any illegal blocking attempt that immediately ends play (like being in the net or being a backrow blocker) is a blocking error, and any legal block attempt that does not immediately end play is not.
|
|
|
Post by silverchloride on Dec 5, 2022 20:19:44 GMT -5
what does a "blocking error" in the box score represent? Is it when a blocker is called for being in the net? Or is it when an attacker "tools" the block, hitting the hands of the blocker and sending the ball out of the court? Net. Also being a backrow blocker is a blocking error, I think. And any other illegal blocking action. But getting tooled is not a blocking error. That is good to know. I was under the impression that getting tooled was an error =)
|
|
|
Post by juancook on Dec 5, 2022 20:24:33 GMT -5
Here's a question - whether its dumb or not, is for y'all to judge:
Are there NCAA issued limits on the amount of practice a team can have during the tournament? I think I heard something about 1.5 hours/week? If there is a limit, what is it?
What about during the course of the season and the run up to the season? Are there limits then as well?
What about the off season? Are teams allowed to practice? Can the players get together and practice on their own without a coach?
I've always wondered all of this.
|
|
|
Post by jayj79 on Dec 5, 2022 20:26:02 GMT -5
Also being a backrow blocker is a blocking error does getting called for an illegal backrow attack get recorded as an attack error?
|
|
|
Post by naujack85 on Dec 5, 2022 20:41:25 GMT -5
Also being a backrow blocker is a blocking error does getting called for an illegal backrow attack get recorded as an attack error? Yes
|
|
|
Post by widdledumpling on Dec 5, 2022 20:51:04 GMT -5
Here's a question - whether its dumb or not, is for y'all to judge: Are there NCAA issued limits on the amount of practice a team can have during the tournament? I think I heard something about 1.5 hours/week? If there is a limit, what is it? What about during the course of the season and the run up to the season? Are there limits then as well? What about the off season? Are teams allowed to practice? Can the players get together and practice on their own without a coach? I've always wondered all of this. There are limits on the amount you’re allowed to practice players during the regular season. The exception is players who are in the pipeline for their country’s national team—apparently, you’re allowed to practice them as much as you can while keeping them healthy and happy. Texas’ Coach Elliot talked about this in a Q&A with donors, mentioning Logan Eggleston and Avery Skinner (I think) as players who are in the team USA pipeline, and Melanie Parra (Team Mexico pipeline) [Edit] Also he doesn’t coach Bergmann, but this would obviously apply to her too (Team Brazil)
|
|
|
Post by Brutus Buckeye on Dec 5, 2022 20:55:42 GMT -5
Which players are best at "sizzling the pits"?
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Dec 5, 2022 21:56:43 GMT -5
Not so much volleyball, but electronics or computer question.
During VB matches, both my TV and my desktop (Windows 11) keep missing serves. It's not a constant problem. Only happens about 40% of the time. So it's inconsistent, which makes it even more frustrating. And no matter what settings I adjust it doesn't get better.
For example, the last Hawaii tournament match, my desktop missed the ace serve that ended the match. Imagine my frustration.
And yes, I've tried re-booting the computer and I unplugged the TV and plugged it back in. No change.
I wish it was still baseball season, so I could check to see if TV/computer are missing pitches.
Grrrrr!
Tips appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by gingersam on Dec 5, 2022 23:26:44 GMT -5
What is a 5-1 or a 6-2?
|
|
|
Post by cbusvball on Dec 5, 2022 23:52:59 GMT -5
It is the system the team is running. The first number (5 or 6) is the number of different hitters that will be in the front row through the 6 rotations. The second number (1 or 2) is the number of setters used in the 6 rotations. In a 5-1 a team will have 2 left side outside hitters (OH), 2 middle blockers (MB), 1 right side opposite hitter (Opp), and 1 setter. In a 6-2 a team will have 2 OH, 2 MB, 2 Opps, and 2 setters. When the setter would rotate into the front row she would substitute out for an Opp and the Opp who was on the floor would sub out for the other setter who would come into serve. Another possibility, although much rarer, is a 5-2 where the setter rotates through the front row like in the 5-1 but the team uses a different setter, normally taller, for the front row than the back row.
|
|
|
Post by JT on Dec 6, 2022 0:21:33 GMT -5
It is the system the team is running. The first number (5 or 6) is the number of different hitters that will be in the front row through the 6 rotations. The second number (1 or 2) is the number of setters used in the 6 rotations. In a 5-1 a team will have 2 left side outside hitters (OH), 2 middle blockers (MB), 1 right side opposite hitter (Opp), and 1 setter. In a 6-2 a team will have 2 OH, 2 MB, 2 Opps, and 2 setters. When the setter would rotate into the front row she would substitute out for an Opp and the Opp who was on the floor would sub out for the other setter who would come into serve. Another possibility, although much rarer, is a 5-2 where the setter rotates through the front row like in the 5-1 but the team uses a different setter, normally taller, for the front row than the back row. Note that you don’t *need* to sub out the setter(s) when they rotate to the front. While uncommon (rare, even?) you can have a player who sets when she is in the back row, and hits when in the front row (with the player opposite her taking setting responsibility). Gophers ran a 6-2 with both setters playing all six rotations back in 2004 and 05.
|
|