bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016) All-VolleyTalk 2nd Team 2023
Posts: 13,303 
|
Post by bluepenquin on Dec 2, 2022 22:32:29 GMT -5
Gutty performance by Kansas after the debacle of the first set.
That said - not having a sub at 24-24 - I believe that was the first serve of the year for Szabo and she delivers a softball to the Libero for an easy kill out of the middle. Kansas used a substitution late to get a side out with London Davis coming in to get the kill - they probably needed it (it worked). But running out of subs was a real killer.
As for Nebraska - those middles with Hames setting is lethal. Bekka absolutely owns the net.
|
|
|
|
Post by volleyfan24 on Dec 2, 2022 22:32:37 GMT -5
Good thing Nebraska won’t be at home anymore cause my god this was bad
|
|
|
|
Post by dodger on Dec 2, 2022 22:33:10 GMT -5
Come on jc i thought u had the best replay system? Do you turn off a cam when it benefits you? That was awful for you nebraska! Your replays should be the best if you are going to brag make it so Lol none of that is Nebraskas call, let alone cook. It’s a NCAA decision No the decision was on the new system: but that ball didnt need the new system; bragging about your facility and abilities and then a failure to execute !! Own it |
|
|
|
Post by azsker on Dec 2, 2022 22:34:00 GMT -5
Y’all got all those camera angles huh? Lol you seriously can’t be defending that call. I know you’re a huge homer but you have eyes…. we all saw one shot. The ball was hit with enough velocity to move the antenna if it hit the tape close enough to the antenna. For anyone saying it was blatantly clear is biased. Bc I saw the one replay just like everyone else and it didn’t provide an antenna angle or an angle from behind to see where it contacted. Did it appear to? Yes. But they ruled it conclusive. And I just don’t think the conspiracy theories about the NCAA advancing Nebraska for profit is realistic, as much as y’all want it to be because we know that’s where this is going to go. And to think the NCAA can convince enough people to ensure Nebraska advances by making the wrong call in game is absolutely comical. Again-they had access to more angles than we did. And Nebraska has no control over the replays or the camera system. NCAA rules. Get over yourself. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2022 22:34:36 GMT -5
you seriously can’t be defending that call. I know you’re a huge homer but you have eyes…. we all saw one shot. The ball was hit with enough velocity to move the antenna if it hit the tape close enough to the antenna. For anyone saying it was blatantly clear is biased. Bc I saw the one replay just like everyone else and it didn’t provide an antenna angle or an angle from behind to see where it contacted. Did it appear to? Yes. But they ruled it conclusive. And I just don’t think the conspiracy theories about the NCAA advancing Nebraska for profit is realistic, as much as y’all want it to be because we know that’s where this is going to go. And to think the NCAA can convince enough people to ensure Nebraska advances by making the wrong call in game is absolutely comical. Again-they had access to more angles than we did. And Nebraska has no control over the replays or the camera system. NCAA rules. Get over yourself. keep lying to yourself. It was blatant and you know it. You just can’t admit it. I’m not even reading this bs novel of a response because I know that in your heart you know what happened |
|
|
|
Post by andrewwmic on Dec 2, 2022 22:35:45 GMT -5
Lol none of that is Nebraskas call, let alone cook. It’s a NCAA decision No the decision was on the new system: but that ball didnt need the new system; bragging about your facility and abilities and then a failure to execute !! Own it Own what? Own a dictionary because you need to learn how to type. |
|
|
|
Post by jwvolley on Dec 2, 2022 22:35:55 GMT -5
Gutty performance by Kansas after the debacle of the first set. That said - not having a sub at 24-24 - I believe that was the first serve of the year for Szabo and she delivers a softball to the Libero for an easy kill out of the middle. Kansas used a substitution late to get a side out with London Davis coming in to get the kill - they probably needed it (it worked). But running out of subs was a real killer. As for Nebraska - those middles with Hames setting is lethal. Bekka absolutely owns the net. Hey, blue. That was quite the battle after two lopsided sets in Nebraska's favor. I'm glad Kansas got to have a good showing in the tournament. Sorry about that challenge call, no excuse for it really from what I saw. Who knows what would've happened afterwards. Turner is so impressive! |
|
|
|
Post by volleyfan24 on Dec 2, 2022 22:36:00 GMT -5
No need to argue play it back ESPN has the match for you guys to watch it’s ok to say as a home fan that was a bad call and own it not to mention the double during the rally. Bad calls happen but to pretend that it wasn’t egregious is delusional.
|
|
bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016) All-VolleyTalk 2nd Team 2023
Posts: 13,303
|
Post by bluepenquin on Dec 2, 2022 22:36:07 GMT -5
The fact - we didn't get to see the slow mo replay.
I know this has been said over and over - but why is the NCAA not allowing us to see slow instant replay? For all we know - that was a horrible call. And the only way to erase that is to actually show the reply...
|
|
|
|
Post by vergyltantor on Dec 2, 2022 22:36:33 GMT -5
This time of the year, any win is a good win. But it's a good thing the Huskers have 6 days off. The floor defense needs to be cleaned up. Missed assignments, interfering with teammates digs and even running into each other.
|
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Dec 2, 2022 22:36:49 GMT -5
also not a good look to cry your eyes out on every single call like you all do but yet...you do it. So you think its OK for the officials to make a call like they did DESPITE indisputable evidence. Sure seems like the fix is in there hoolie? I realize this is difficult for most of you Nebraska haters to comprehend but if there was indisputable evidence the call would have went Kansas' way. None of you were there nor did you have access to the video's that the judges have but as we have learned from years of couch coaching you are all experts in the field and thats why you are all sitting on your backsides at home and not coaching D1. But please continue the outrage parade. As for you Nebraska fans trading your team down the river? You are most likely watching on your television also. But if you all need to fit in with the outrage crowd go for it. |
|
|
|
Post by azsker on Dec 2, 2022 22:36:57 GMT -5
we all saw one shot. The ball was hit with enough velocity to move the antenna if it hit the tape close enough to the antenna. For anyone saying it was blatantly clear is biased. Bc I saw the one replay just like everyone else and it didn’t provide an antenna angle or an angle from behind to see where it contacted. Did it appear to? Yes. But they ruled it conclusive. And I just don’t think the conspiracy theories about the NCAA advancing Nebraska for profit is realistic, as much as y’all want it to be because we know that’s where this is going to go. And to think the NCAA can convince enough people to ensure Nebraska advances by making the wrong call in game is absolutely comical. Again-they had access to more angles than we did. And Nebraska has no control over the replays or the camera system. NCAA rules. Get over yourself. keep lying to yourself. It was blatant and you know it. You just can’t admit it. I’m not even reading this bs novel of a response because I know that in your heart you know what happened I could totally admit it. I even admitted it appeared to. Lol I think you think Nebraskas success and failures affect me more than they do. They really don’t. I like volleyball. I’m from Nebraska. So I watch. It really doesn’t affect my mood enough to have to lie. |
|
|
|
Post by volleynerd on Dec 2, 2022 22:37:52 GMT -5
Look. I don't know if Kansas wins this in the 5th, or even gets to the fifth. But that ball definitely hit the antenna. That's unforgivable. well if the antenna hit was overturned it would've been set point Kansas, and the subsequent block would've sent it 5.. not word what could have happened there but Kansas was denied the opportunity by a bad call |
|
|
|
Post by ted_heise on Dec 2, 2022 22:37:55 GMT -5
Gutty performance by Kansas after the debacle of the first set. That said - not having a sub at 24-24 - I believe that was the first serve of the year for Szabo and she delivers a softball to the Libero for an easy kill out of the middle. Kansas used a substitution late to get a side out with London Davis coming in to get the kill - they probably needed it (it worked). But running out of subs was a real killer. As for Nebraska - those middles with Hames setting is lethal. Bekka absolutely owns the net. Spot on comments. Hats off to the Jayhawks for pushing the Huskers to the limit. The challenge of the antenna sure seemed wrongly decided, but even if it had gone the other way it's not clear KU would have won the match. Thanks for your great inputs here tonight, bluepenquin. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2022 22:38:39 GMT -5
So you think its OK for the officials to make a call like they did DESPITE indisputable evidence. Sure seems like the fix is in there hoolie? I realize this is difficult for most of you Nebraska haters to comprehend but if there was indisputable evidence the call would have went Kansas' way. None of you were there nor did you have access to the video's that the judges have but as we have learned from years of couch coaching you are all experts in the field and thats why you are all sitting on your backsides at home and not coaching D1. But please continue the outrage parade. As for you Nebraska fans trading your team down the river? You are most likely watching on your television also. But if you all need to fit in with the outrage crowd go for it. Sunderland even commented they didn't show any angles of the play inside Delaney. When does that ever happen? Something smells. |
|
