|
|
Post by redcardđ on Dec 2, 2022 22:38:50 GMT -5
No need to argue play it back ESPN has the match for you guys to watch itâs ok to say as a home fan that was a bad call and own it not to mention the double during the rally. Bad calls happen but to pretend that it wasnât egregious is delusional. good, I thought I saw a very obvious double missed call. |
|
bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016) All-VolleyTalk 2nd Team 2023
Posts: 13,303 
|
Post by bluepenquin on Dec 2, 2022 22:39:18 GMT -5
Gutty performance by Kansas after the debacle of the first set. That said - not having a sub at 24-24 - I believe that was the first serve of the year for Szabo and she delivers a softball to the Libero for an easy kill out of the middle. Kansas used a substitution late to get a side out with London Davis coming in to get the kill - they probably needed it (it worked). But running out of subs was a real killer. As for Nebraska - those middles with Hames setting is lethal. Bekka absolutely owns the net. Hey, blue. That was quite the battle after two lopsided sets in Nebraska's favor. I'm glad Kansas got to have a good showing in the tournament. Sorry about that challenge call, no excuse for it really from what I saw. Who knows what would've happened afterwards. Turner is so impressive! I am happy with the way KU played. I thought they played well in the 2nd set - Nebraska was just better (and it was their best set). The first set was horrible by KU and not good by Nebraska. That was the set where Nebraska gave them some room (despite the score). No worries about the call. Teams either win or lose - there are no what ifs. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewwmic on Dec 2, 2022 22:39:39 GMT -5
I realize this is difficult for most of you Nebraska haters to comprehend but if there was indisputable evidence the call would have went Kansas' way. None of you were there nor did you have access to the video's that the judges have but as we have learned from years of couch coaching you are all experts in the field and thats why you are all sitting on your backsides at home and not coaching D1. But please continue the outrage parade. As for you Nebraska fans trading your team down the river? You are most likely watching on your television also. But if you all need to fit in with the outrage crowd go for it. Sunderland even commented they didn't show any angles of the play inside Delaney. When does that ever happen? Something smells. For the 20th time- this is an ncaa ruling. Not a Nebraska decision. |
|
|
|
Post by butternut on Dec 2, 2022 22:40:01 GMT -5
Liked seeing more middle, Krause has been doing well lately too. But things seem off even accounting for loss of Kenzie. Certainly not a Michael Jordan flu game performance!
|
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Dec 2, 2022 22:40:32 GMT -5
I realize this is difficult for most of you Nebraska haters to comprehend but if there was indisputable evidence the call would have went Kansas' way. None of you were there nor did you have access to the video's that the judges have but as we have learned from years of couch coaching you are all experts in the field and thats why you are all sitting on your backsides at home and not coaching D1. But please continue the outrage parade. As for you Nebraska fans trading your team down the river? You are most likely watching on your television also. But if you all need to fit in with the outrage crowd go for it. Sunderland even commented they didn't show any angles of the play inside Delaney. When does that ever happen? Something smells. Sunderland can barely get the names of the players said correctly so there is that. This outrage parade is better than the Thanksgiving Macy's Day parade. |
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Dec 2, 2022 22:40:58 GMT -5
you seriously canât be defending that call. I know youâre a huge homer but you have eyesâŚ. we all saw one shot. The ball was hit with enough velocity to move the antenna if it hit the tape close enough to the antenna. For anyone saying it was blatantly clear is biased. Bc I saw the one replay just like everyone else and it didnât provide an antenna angle or an angle from behind to see where it contacted. Did it appear to? Yes. But they ruled it conclusive. And I just donât think the conspiracy theories about the NCAA advancing Nebraska for profit is realistic, as much as yâall want it to be because we know thatâs where this is going to go. And to think the NCAA can convince enough people to ensure Nebraska advances by making the wrong call in game is absolutely comical. Again-they had access to more angles than we did. And Nebraska has no control over the replays or the camera system. NCAA rules. Get over yourself. I saw that it clearly hit the antennae and then bounced down off the net tape. Nobody is being obtuse here. I had nothing on this match. No favorites. But I do have something on fairness, and if the guy was so scared of repercussions that he saw the video that way, then we have a serious problem. |
|
|
|
Post by jwvolley on Dec 2, 2022 22:41:04 GMT -5
Look. I don't know if Kansas wins this in the 5th, or even gets to the fifth. But that ball definitely hit the antenna. That's unforgivable. well if the antenna hit was overturned it would've been set point Kansas, and the subsequent block would've sent it 5.. not word what could have happened there but Kansas was denied the opportunity by a bad call omg, this is driving me crazy. the subsequent block DOESN'T EXIST if the call is overturned. Maybe Kansas gets a different block anyways, maybe they kill a ball in transition, maybe they ace Nebraska on their serve...those are unknowns. |
|
|
|
Post by Maple Canyon on Dec 2, 2022 22:41:07 GMT -5
Just left Devaney where I was sitting behind the scorerâs table. Ref on replay didnât have the same looks available, was mostly looking down the net cam and not a sideline view. He was saying he couldnât tell if it hit the antenna.
Live and on the replay showed on the big screen in Devaney, I thought the ball hit the antenna.
|
|
|
|
Post by azsker on Dec 2, 2022 22:41:09 GMT -5
Look. I don't know if Kansas wins this in the 5th, or even gets to the fifth. But that ball definitely hit the antenna. That's unforgivable. well if the antenna hit was overturned it would've been set point Kansas, and the subsequent block would've sent it 5.. not word what could have happened there but Kansas was denied the opportunity by a bad call itâs not even realistic to say this because if it was Kansasâ point then they wouldâve served and not Nebraska and the block would have never occurred because it would have been a completely different rally. Lol Nebraska. Still that girl. |
|
bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016) All-VolleyTalk 2nd Team 2023
Posts: 13,303
|
Post by bluepenquin on Dec 2, 2022 22:41:58 GMT -5
Look. I don't know if Kansas wins this in the 5th, or even gets to the fifth. But that ball definitely hit the antenna. That's unforgivable. well if the antenna hit was overturned it would've been set point Kansas, and the subsequent block would've sent it 5.. not word what could have happened there but Kansas was denied the opportunity by a bad call I mean - KU would have served not received, so no idea if they get a block on the next point for the set. They still had a real chance to win - it wasn't the last point. |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Dec 2, 2022 22:42:37 GMT -5
Hey, blue. That was quite the battle after two lopsided sets in Nebraska's favor. I'm glad Kansas got to have a good showing in the tournament. Sorry about that challenge call, no excuse for it really from what I saw. Who knows what would've happened afterwards. Turner is so impressive! I am happy with the way KU played. I thought they played well in the 2nd set - Nebraska was just better (and it was their best set). The first set was horrible by KU and not good by Nebraska. That was the set where Nebraska gave them some room (despite the score). No worries about the call. Teams either win or lose - there are no what ifs. classy as always.... |
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Dec 2, 2022 22:42:38 GMT -5
Just left Devaney where I was sitting behind the scorerâs table. Ref on replay didnât have the same looks available, was mostly looking down the net cam and not a sideline view. He was saying he couldnât tell if it hit the antenna. Live and on the replay showed on the big screen in Devaney, I thought the ball hit the antenna. If true, this is absurd. How does Nebraska not have a camera from behind the endline available? |
|
|
|
Post by azsker on Dec 2, 2022 22:42:53 GMT -5
I realize this is difficult for most of you Nebraska haters to comprehend but if there was indisputable evidence the call would have went Kansas' way. None of you were there nor did you have access to the video's that the judges have but as we have learned from years of couch coaching you are all experts in the field and thats why you are all sitting on your backsides at home and not coaching D1. But please continue the outrage parade. As for you Nebraska fans trading your team down the river? You are most likely watching on your television also. But if you all need to fit in with the outrage crowd go for it. Sunderland even commented they didn't show any angles of the play inside Delaney. When does that ever happen? Something smells. Itâs the NCAA tournament. They enforce the rules, which are different than regular season where Nebraska shows NUMEROUS views. Did you not recognize it was that way for EVERY challenge-even the ones Nebraska challenged? |
|
|
|
Post by dodger on Dec 2, 2022 22:42:56 GMT -5
No the decision was on the new system: but that ball didnt need the new system; bragging about your facility and abilities and then a failure to execute !! Own it Own what? Own a dictionary because you need to learn how to type. Yes my typing makes your system failure ok? Own it dude/dudette homer!! but replay system, and camera placement, etc. which jc constantly says nebraska has best of best and it would be better if ncaa didn't hold us back. You do not say that and then have a blatant failure of your facility! |
|
|
|
Post by ted_heise on Dec 2, 2022 22:42:58 GMT -5
This time of the year, any win is a good win. But it's a good thing the Huskers have 6 days off. The floor defense needs to be cleaned up. Missed assignments, interfering with teammates digs and even running into each other. Indeed. At one point toward the end, there was a stack of three Huskers, one on top of the other. |
|
