|
Post by mervinswerved on Jan 24, 2024 14:36:08 GMT -5
When I say “successful” I’m referring to him being elected President and then getting more people to vote for him second time around. So, losing the popular vote twice, being impeached twice, losing both the popular and the electoral college vote, losing the House, and the Senate, 4 indictments, 91 felony counts. Are you talking that kind of success? To be fair, Trump is 1 for 2 on running for president. Better than Biden's 1 for 3!
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Jan 24, 2024 14:37:39 GMT -5
So, losing the popular vote twice, being impeached twice, losing both the popular and the electoral college vote, losing the House, and the Senate, 4 indictments, 91 felony counts. Are you talking that kind of success? To be fair, Trump is 1 for 2 on running for president. Better than Biden's 1 for 3! I'm predicting they will both be 50% after November
|
|
|
Post by mervinswerved on Jan 24, 2024 14:50:25 GMT -5
To be fair, Trump is 1 for 2 on running for president. Better than Biden's 1 for 3! I'm predicting they will both be 50% after November Interesting math, given Trump is going to be the nominee in November.
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Jan 24, 2024 14:52:51 GMT -5
When I say “successful” I’m referring to him being elected President and then getting more people to vote for him second time around. So, losing the popular vote twice, being impeached twice, losing both the popular and the electoral college vote, losing the House, and the Senate, 4 indictments, 91 felony counts. Are you talking that kind of success? Nope, I already listed what I thought Trump’s success was (maybe you missed it). I get that it’s factual so you have problems with it. You can be the truth denier who claims getting elected president isn’t a measure of success. You do you.
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jan 24, 2024 14:52:54 GMT -5
I'm predicting they will both be 50% after November Interesting math, given Trump is going to be the nominee in November. Your math is interesting too. Biden has only been the nominee once. He's batting a thousand.
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Jan 24, 2024 14:54:37 GMT -5
I'm predicting they will both be 50% after November Interesting math, given Trump is going to be the nominee in November. Square stops thinking rationally when Trump is mentioned. That’s the sad realization of TDS.
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Jan 24, 2024 14:54:38 GMT -5
I'm predicting they will both be 50% after November Interesting math, given Trump is going to be the nominee in November. yup, my bad. Thanks for the correction
|
|
|
Post by mervinswerved on Jan 24, 2024 14:54:59 GMT -5
Interesting math, given Trump is going to be the nominee in November. Your math is interesting too. Biden has only been the nominee once. He's batting a thousand. He's officially run for president three times.
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Jan 24, 2024 14:55:22 GMT -5
Interesting math, given Trump is going to be the nominee in November. Square stops thinking rationally when Trump is mentioned. That’s the sad realization of TDS. actually, my mistake went in Trump's favor. You would have realized that if you weren't so dense.
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Jan 24, 2024 14:56:49 GMT -5
So, losing the popular vote twice, being impeached twice, losing both the popular and the electoral college vote, losing the House, and the Senate, 4 indictments, 91 felony counts. Are you talking that kind of success? Nope, I already listed what I thought Trump’s success was (maybe you missed it). I get that it’s factual so you have problems with it. You can be the truth denier who claims getting elected president isn’t a measure of success. You do you. I don't have a problem with that. Trump won the electoral vote in 2016. He has been a disaster to the Republican party ever since then.
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jan 24, 2024 14:57:09 GMT -5
Your math is interesting too. Biden has only been the nominee once. He's batting a thousand. He's officially run for president three times. I understand. I'm just raising the age-old question, is it better to have loved and lost, or never have loved at all?
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Jan 24, 2024 14:57:41 GMT -5
Square stops thinking rationally when Trump is mentioned. That’s the sad realization of TDS. actually, my mistake went in Trump's favor. You would have realized that if you weren't so dense. Hey way to go! You admitted you made a mistake. (Growth?) Now what about your fallacy that being elected president isn’t a measure of success. Still sticking by that one?
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Jan 24, 2024 14:57:43 GMT -5
Your math is interesting too. Biden has only been the nominee once. He's batting a thousand. He's officially run for president three times. So you were cherry picking and not really being fair.
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Jan 24, 2024 14:58:51 GMT -5
So, losing the popular vote twice, being impeached twice, losing both the popular and the electoral college vote, losing the House, and the Senate, 4 indictments, 91 felony counts. Are you talking that kind of success? To be fair, Trump is 1 for 2 on running for president. Better than Biden's 1 for 3! To be fair, Trump has officially run as a candidate for president four times, in 2000, 2016, 2020, and 2024; he also "unofficially" campaigned in 2012 and mulled a run in 2004.
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Jan 24, 2024 14:58:58 GMT -5
He's officially run for president three times. I understand. I'm just raising the age-old question, is it better to have loved and lost, or never have loved at all? Always to have loved and lost. To never have loved leaves you being jsquare and that’s just sad.
|
|