|
Post by longboards on Aug 4, 2023 8:21:32 GMT -5
1) I didn't know who Harvey was until the scandal broke. He's a guilty POS. 2) in that entire rant, you avoided the content of my post (surprise surprise) and still didn't just admit you made a mistake about PeeWee. You are simply incorrigible. I am in news hound and knew all about Pee-wee Herman. It was plastered all over the news. That’s the entire point of my post wasn’t it? The hypocrisy? If I didn’t know about him I would’ve done the hypocrisy angle. But you keep trying honey. "Now you’re making fun of Pee-wee Herman. What a guy." - Holiday
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Aug 4, 2023 8:49:17 GMT -5
I am in news hound and knew all about Pee-wee Herman. It was plastered all over the news. That’s the entire point of my post wasn’t it? The hypocrisy? If I didn’t know about him I would’ve done the hypocrisy angle. But you keep trying honey. "Now you’re making fun of Pee-wee Herman. What a guy." - Holiday Making fun of? Hardly. Your 15 minutes is up.
|
|
|
Post by longboards on Aug 4, 2023 8:52:02 GMT -5
"Now you’re making fun of Pee-wee Herman. What a guy." - Holiday Making fun of? Hardly. Your 15 minutes is up. That was your quote knucklehead
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Aug 4, 2023 9:12:42 GMT -5
Making fun of? Hardly. Your 15 minutes is up. That was your quote knucklehead You’re fun this morning. I love it
|
|
|
Post by oldnewbie on Aug 4, 2023 9:52:13 GMT -5
"Now you’re making fun of Pee-wee Herman. What a guy." - Holiday Why do you need to pull a whataboutism instead of simply saying 'yikes,I didn't know that about him'? Really, is that what you got from that? Here is what I absolutely love. You democrat liberals totally loved Harvey Weinstein. Hollywood loved Harvey Weinstein. Everyone knew he was raping girls and yet you still loved Harvey. People even joke about it and yet since he had so much money and power you guys were thrilled with Harvey because he donated to your political causes. He was your dirty Sugar daddy. Fast forward to Joe Biden, the man who used to Hang out with white supremacists and pushed segregation. Don’t you think it’s odd that his kid uses the N-word all the time? Joe has had the opinion of whatever is popular with his party at the time. He’s the most wishy-washy and lying sack of crap in the history of politics. Joe not only allowed his kid to fleece foreign governments, he supported it. And you people have embraced him with open arms also. So what does that make a democrat? Are they just so easily fooled in stupid or are they people who don’t really care about the character of their leaders as long as they get what they want politically? I think it’s both. The complete lack of any sense of irony is truly stunning.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Aug 4, 2023 10:08:59 GMT -5
Really, is that what you got from that? Here is what I absolutely love. You democrat liberals totally loved Harvey Weinstein. Hollywood loved Harvey Weinstein. Everyone knew he was raping girls and yet you still loved Harvey. People even joke about it and yet since he had so much money and power you guys were thrilled with Harvey because he donated to your political causes. He was your dirty Sugar daddy. Fast forward to Joe Biden, the man who used to Hang out with white supremacists and pushed segregation. Don’t you think it’s odd that his kid uses the N-word all the time? Joe has had the opinion of whatever is popular with his party at the time. He’s the most wishy-washy and lying sack of crap in the history of politics. Joe not only allowed his kid to fleece foreign governments, he supported it. And you people have embraced him with open arms also. So what does that make a democrat? Are they just so easily fooled in stupid or are they people who don’t really care about the character of their leaders as long as they get what they want politically? I think it’s both. The complete lack of any sense of irony is truly stunning. It truly is
|
|
|
Post by maplespear on Aug 4, 2023 15:58:15 GMT -5
Just saw S O F. Wow, unbelievable just how many people are involved with child abduction. A line from the movie was, "you can only sell a bag of cocaine once, but you can sell a child eight times a day." Really good movie, well executed. Always liked Jim Caviezel.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Aug 4, 2023 18:49:42 GMT -5
I should’ve expanded on that and said the entertainment industry. Serious question. Why are Democrats not on this child exploitation thing big time? That would be usually something they are champion of? We actually are, we just don't fundraise off of it. Obama's Justice for Victims of Human Trafficking Act was a major meaningful step. This was an actually one of Obama's pet issues and a lot of his early work on it is largely ignored: Here's some reading: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/issues/foreign-policy/end-human-traffickingreally...then why fight against a movie so hard that brings attention to such a dark crime that happens to children worldwide. Why do Democrats fight so hard to leave the southern border open only to have lax laws in granting people sponsorship of children that are on their own? Did it ever occur to you that these sponsors are child predators and traffickers? You bet...you doing so much.
|
|
|
Post by mervinswerved on Aug 4, 2023 18:53:03 GMT -5
One of the SOF guys going down for child trafficking is just *chef's kiss* so on brand.
|
|
|
Post by maplespear on Aug 4, 2023 19:35:59 GMT -5
One of the SOF guys going down for child trafficking is just *chef's kiss* so on brand. what ?
|
|
|
Post by staticb on Aug 4, 2023 19:47:42 GMT -5
really...then why fight against a movie so hard that brings attention to such a dark crime that happens to children worldwide. Why do Democrats fight so hard to leave the southern border open only to have lax laws in granting people sponsorship of children that are on their own? Did it ever occur to you that these sponsors are child predators and traffickers? You bet...you doing so much. This post is EXACTLY why we fight against it. The movie is an unrealistic portrayal of actual child trafficking. 99% of people are trafficked by family members of partners. Most come in through legal ports of entry and a %*$# load of them actually have citizenship for the country they are being trafficked in. A lot of the progress that was made by Obama on child trafficking was undone by the Trump administration, who claimed that doing things like building walls would help fight against it. I posted a link earlier (that you ignored) that basically said that legitimate child trafficking hotlines are being inundated with false leads and conspiracy theories that it takes time and money to debunk/look at/educate people.
|
|
|
Post by mervinswerved on Aug 4, 2023 20:13:11 GMT -5
One of the SOF guys going down for child trafficking is just *chef's kiss* so on brand. what ? Some schmuck who gave money to fund the movie got arrested this week for kidnapping a child.
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Aug 4, 2023 20:24:59 GMT -5
really...then why fight against a movie so hard that brings attention to such a dark crime that happens to children worldwide. Why do Democrats fight so hard to leave the southern border open only to have lax laws in granting people sponsorship of children that are on their own? Did it ever occur to you that these sponsors are child predators and traffickers? You bet...you doing so much. Anti-child trafficking (and human trafficking in general) has been a huge point of emphasis for the State Department, DHS, United Nations, European Union, and dozens of NGO's for many years now. Just because you had no clue before watching a B movie about it doesn't mean it wasn't happening, and nobody is "fighting" against the movie. People are pointing out it's a fictional representation of a complex issue. The rest of your post is your standard Holiday feast of ignorance.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Aug 4, 2023 20:45:14 GMT -5
really...then why fight against a movie so hard that brings attention to such a dark crime that happens to children worldwide. Why do Democrats fight so hard to leave the southern border open only to have lax laws in granting people sponsorship of children that are on their own? Did it ever occur to you that these sponsors are child predators and traffickers? You bet...you doing so much. Anti-child trafficking (and human trafficking in general) has been a huge point of emphasis for the State Department, DHS, United Nations, European Union, and dozens of NGO's for many years now. Just because you had no clue before watching a B movie about it doesn't mean it wasn't happening, and nobody is "fighting" against the movie. People are pointing out it's a fictional representation of a complex issue. The rest of your post is your standard Holiday feast of ignorance. Want to stop child trafficking close the border and stop putting the cartels in charge of our country. Only an idiot could not figure that out.
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Aug 4, 2023 20:49:20 GMT -5
Anti-child trafficking (and human trafficking in general) has been a huge point of emphasis for the State Department, DHS, United Nations, European Union, and dozens of NGO's for many years now. Just because you had no clue before watching a B movie about it doesn't mean it wasn't happening, and nobody is "fighting" against the movie. People are pointing out it's a fictional representation of a complex issue. The rest of your post is your standard Holiday feast of ignorance. Want to stop child trafficking close the border and stop putting the cartels in charge of our country. Only an idiot could not figure that out. You have no idea what you're talking about, of course. But that's never stopped you before. I mean, everything you know about human trafficking you learned from a Jim Caviezel movie, LOL.
|
|