|
|
Post by dokterrudi on Nov 10, 2023 11:56:53 GMT -5
It should have been in 4. Rubin really got into her own head, body language was telling. Hambly talked to her a couple of times, good thing her defense was still decent. Nice to see Pringle come in for Baird. Love Francis kills!!….Miner continually setting the outsides too tight. Of course I’ll take it, no shame in winning ugly… certainly better than getting swept by Kansas.I'm wondering if you meant to say Kansas State? of course, was just too lazy to add the extra letters. |
|
|
|
Post by baytree on Nov 10, 2023 17:03:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Nov 10, 2023 18:08:32 GMT -5
Lol at Michella Chester wearing what are nearly stilts so she can talk with the VB players without looking like a munchkin.
|
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Nov 10, 2023 18:22:31 GMT -5
Lol at Michella Chester wearing what are nearly stilts so she can talk with the VB players without looking like a munchkin. She interviewed Kipp earlier in the day and Kipp dominated height wise. At least this time she chose someone shorter. |
|
|
|
Post by timduckforlife on Nov 10, 2023 20:10:34 GMT -5
Slightly different take, but o just think Stanford makes less mistakes. And I'm not talking stat sheet errors. Lady Cards always seem to be at every hit or dig or every ball on their side of the net. Sure, might not be perfect passes, but someone is always there. With my Ducks, they seem to make a few mental lapses, miss a defensive assignment and Stanfords got some clean kills and with a match this close, it makes a difference.
I think also reared up in the 5th with Gabi being unsure if a ball was hers and she hesitated and gave an easy point to the Cards.
|
|
|
|
Post by davethecoug on Nov 10, 2023 21:13:09 GMT -5
I will not miss the pac-12 network, it’s a joke. Always has been. Is Big-10 broadcasting better? Unless you are Nebraska, the answer is probably "no".
In the Pac-12, the TV schedule is set prior to the season and equal visibility is the norm. Each team is broadcast on the Pac-12 Network ($$$) approximately 10 times and the other 10 matches are Livestreamed (free) by the host team. Some of the Livestreams are also broadcast on Pac-12 Insider (free). The Network broadcasts are usually pretty good (although the quality has dropped since Covid). The quality of the Livestreams is poor to medium.
The Big-10 has the B1G Network ($$$) and B1G+ ($$$). From what I've seen, the quality of the B1G Network broadcasts is pretty good. My experience with the B1G+ broadcasts is that the quality is poor to medium and, on average, no better than the Pac-12 Livestreams. The bad part is that you have to pay for the poor to medium B1G+ broadcasts!
Big-10 teams are not treated equal when it comes to the broadcast network. Nebraska is broadcast on the B1G network more than anyone else. Maryland only gets 3 matches on the B1G Network.
I doubt the fans of USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Washington will be happy with their future Big-10 volleyball broadcasts. |
|
|
|
Post by davethecoug on Nov 10, 2023 21:28:51 GMT -5
I wondered if it was just me somehow, or if the stream really did that for everybody. And this is a LONG commercial break. Pac-12 Insider is simply a re-broadcast of the home schools Livestream. Hence, you can avoid these commercials by simply watching the match on the Livestream page and not on Insider.
I have bookmarked all the Livestream pages of the 12 Pac schools. When a match is listed for Insider, I simply go to the Livestream pages for the home school.
Note: Each school has multiple Livestream pages (Livestream, Livestream-2, Livestream-3, etc...). Usually, the VB matches are on Livestream or Livestream-2.
For example:
|
|
|
|
Post by photos1 on Nov 11, 2023 2:37:22 GMT -5
I will not miss the pac-12 network, it’s a joke. Always has been. Is Big-10 broadcasting better? Unless you are Nebraska, the answer is probably "no".
In the Pac-12, the TV schedule is set prior to the season and equal visibility is the norm. Each team is broadcast on the Pac-12 Network ($$$) approximately 10 times and the other 10 matches are Livestreamed (free) by the host team. Some of the Livestreams are also broadcast on Pac-12 Insider (free). The Network broadcasts are usually pretty good (although the quality has dropped since Covid). The quality of the Livestreams is poor to medium.
The Big-10 has the B1G Network ($$$) and B1G+ ($$$). From what I've seen, the quality of the B1G Network broadcasts is pretty good. My experience with the B1G+ broadcasts is that the quality is poor to medium and, on average, no better than the Pac-12 Livestreams. The bad part is that you have to pay for the poor to medium B1G+ broadcasts!
Big-10 teams are not treated equal when it comes to the broadcast network. Nebraska is broadcast on the B1G network more than anyone else. Maryland only gets 3 matches on the B1G Network.
I doubt the fans of USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Washington will be happy with their future Big-10 volleyball broadcasts. The B1Gnetwork gets a lot of pats on backs for the great support they give volleyball, and they do have a volleyball media day for the for the schools, and they did jump in to promote and televise the Stadium match in Lincoln, but on a daily and weekly basis their volleyball coverage is 💩. Everyday during football and basketball season, there are daily shows discussing past games, upcoming games with a variety of analysts who discuss the teams, coaches and everything about the conference. And once or twice a week, during these football or basketball shows they might give a 90 second mention that volleyball in the conference exists. There is no daily show dedicated to volleyball…there is no weekly show dedicated to volleyball… why not? Despite the clear fan interest in volleyball, the B1G network avoids having any real discussions about the players, matches or volleyball within the conference. It’s sad really…a missed opportunity to be sure… I just don’t understand why the network doesn’t have a weekly show to discuss the volleyball in the conference. Why don’t they have a studio host dedicated to volleyball? I guess their real interest is more of a tolerance…. Or they wouldn’t be satisfied with the substandard play by play and analysts they have on the telecasts, complete with their chief analyst who doesn’t understand a volleyball match and game are not interchangeable terms. oh well… 🏐 |
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Nov 11, 2023 13:19:40 GMT -5
Is Big-10 broadcasting better? Unless you are Nebraska, the answer is probably "no".
In the Pac-12, the TV schedule is set prior to the season and equal visibility is the norm. Each team is broadcast on the Pac-12 Network ($$$) approximately 10 times and the other 10 matches are Livestreamed (free) by the host team. Some of the Livestreams are also broadcast on Pac-12 Insider (free). The Network broadcasts are usually pretty good (although the quality has dropped since Covid). The quality of the Livestreams is poor to medium. The Big-10 has the B1G Network ($$$) and B1G+ ($$$). From what I've seen, the quality of the B1G Network broadcasts is pretty good. My experience with the B1G+ broadcasts is that the quality is poor to medium and, on average, no better than the Pac-12 Livestreams. The bad part is that you have to pay for the poor to medium B1G+ broadcasts! Big-10 teams are not treated equal when it comes to the broadcast network. Nebraska is broadcast on the B1G network more than anyone else. Maryland only gets 3 matches on the B1G Network.
I doubt the fans of USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Washington will be happy with their future Big-10 volleyball broadcasts. The B1Gnetwork gets a lot of pats on backs for the great support they give volleyball, and they do have a volleyball media day for the for the schools, and they did jump in to promote and televise the Stadium match in Lincoln, but on a daily and weekly basis their volleyball coverage is 💩. Everyday during football and basketball season, there are daily shows discussing past games, upcoming games with a variety of analysts who discuss the teams, coaches and everything about the conference. And once or twice a week, during these football or basketball shows they might give a 90 second mention that volleyball in the conference exists. There is no daily show dedicated to volleyball…there is no weekly show dedicated to volleyball… why not? Despite the clear fan interest in volleyball, the B1G network avoids having any real discussions about the players, matches or volleyball within the conference. It’s sad really…a missed opportunity to be sure… I just don’t understand why the network doesn’t have a weekly show to discuss the volleyball in the conference. Why don’t they have a studio host dedicated to volleyball? I guess their real interest is more of a tolerance…. Or they wouldn’t be satisfied with the substandard play by play and analysts they have on the telecasts, complete with their chief analyst who doesn’t understand a volleyball match and game are not interchangeable terms. oh well… 🏐 Shame on the B1G. With all that money they could do a lot better. The Pac-12 is worse, but their excuse is less money and years of incompetent management. |
|
