|
Post by springs on Jan 24, 2015 9:53:22 GMT -5
Gee, I wonder what coach has spearheaded this?
|
|
|
Post by bc1900 on Jan 24, 2015 12:57:15 GMT -5
Ah. And of course, they have no reason to be biased toward the effectiveness of their own product.... I'm not saying they aren't accurate. But I would have more confidence in them if instead of seeing a computer-generated animation, we saw the actual video. If, instead of analyzing the video, all they did was use a random number generator and draw an in or out animation based on that, would you really be able to tell the difference? That's true, but the players seem to be OK with it and I think they would be complaining if there were accuracy problems. Standard video isn't good enough because of the speed and size of the ball, it's tough even with the human eye. That's why my doubles opponents call my serves out when they are clearly in. A volleyball, being bigger and slower, could possibly be called using standard video replay.
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on Jan 24, 2015 13:12:53 GMT -5
Gee, I wonder what coach has spearheaded this? The laughing coach who just left UW. Nice parting gift to his friends in the Pac-12.
|
|
|
Post by trollhunter on Jan 24, 2015 13:32:29 GMT -5
The computer animation must be is a tennis by-product.
The World League (volleyball) used actual video footage reviewed by official on sideline when I watched.
There are good reasons why tennis uses the audio beep and animation, but I don't think they apply to volleyball.
|
|
|
Post by Not Me on Jan 24, 2015 13:34:34 GMT -5
Gee, I wonder what coach has spearheaded this? The laughing coach who just left UW. Nice parting gift to his friends in the Pac-12. Yeah, except for it is the Big 12 that asked for the rule change.
|
|
|
Post by canda on Jan 24, 2015 14:01:15 GMT -5
I think there is more mistakes made on touches than in or out calls! GO HUSKERS And these are almost impossible to detect on video, unless you have as many cameras as they do at an NFL game. I've never seen a video refute, or even confirm, a touch. It's still not clear, even on replay. Imagine how long it will delay a match while officials look at video for that. That's why I say balls in and out only. Easy to see, quick to correct. There have been enough instances in the last few seasons where a correct call on a ball in and out might have changed the outcome of a set. I'm sure partisans of every team remember the exact instances. Can't say the same for touches.
|
|
|
Post by redincolorado on Jan 24, 2015 14:34:20 GMT -5
Tennis has the computer animation that is fast and clear. Actually is exciting to watch. I want to watch the game not some bull%*$# replay. Well that's just to bad for you. Replay review is coming to ALL of college VB. You've already been watching endless replays on TV anyway so might as well make them count for something when they clearly show the official got it wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2015 15:53:38 GMT -5
Two threads have been combined. I hope this does not cause some weirdness with the order of the posts.
|
|
|
Post by bucky415 on Jan 24, 2015 16:05:01 GMT -5
I hate replay. I don't want to sit around for five minutes while they try to figure it out. Mistakes are made. That is life. Wisconsin lost to Penn State in 2007 not because of the missed contact on Harmotto, but because they had two games to four at the end of sets and lost both. Also, it may have been karma for all the iffy calls that went their way in the Field House over the years.
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Jan 24, 2015 16:46:44 GMT -5
Mistakes ARE made. But that doesn't mean that can't be corrected...and quickly.
And sometimes they are critical mistakes. Two 4th set line calls in the UW/Nebraska tournament match probably would have been overturned with simple instant replay.
I agree however, that, for now, replay should be line calls only...not touches.
It makes no sense to ignore technology that can improve officiating.
|
|
|
Post by springs on Jan 24, 2015 16:56:03 GMT -5
I'm all for getting the correct call. My question is this - if the coach challenges a call, and it is upheld, is there a penalty? In football, a coach loses a timeout. Could there be a consequence for this?
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on Jan 24, 2015 17:19:37 GMT -5
I hate replay. I don't want to sit around for five minutes................. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by bigfan on Jan 24, 2015 17:21:36 GMT -5
You've already been watching endless replays on TV....... Dont watch TV
|
|
|
Post by BigFanEst2006 on Jan 24, 2015 20:02:48 GMT -5
Big XII should be interesting to watch next year. I am just hoping the officials are somewhat trained with it before a conference match so when it is time for a video review, the guess work with what to do or where to look is taken out of the mix. And it will be interesting to know if a coach calls for a video replay, does it burn a timeout if the play stands?
|
|
|
Post by rogero1 on Jan 24, 2015 21:21:59 GMT -5
Big XII should be interesting to watch next year. I am just hoping the officials are somewhat trained with it before a conference match so when it is time for a video review, the guess work with what to do or where to look is taken out of the mix. And it will be interesting to know if a coach calls for a video replay, does it burn a timeout if the play stands? Officials are already trained with commercial breaks for TV. Should not be a problem. If a coach loses their challenge, they burn a timeout and their setter/libero/best hitter has to sit out the next play. ;-)
|
|