|
Post by BuckysHeat on May 4, 2016 10:08:56 GMT -5
Agreed. Having seen all three of those (Sting) setters play this year, next year is going to be very interesting however it pans out. Will they all stay at Sting? Are there other clubs, they would consider (including Chicago area) for playtime and roles? Moshers and Wucherers both have three daughter on Sting teams, doubtful there would be any reason for one to drive to Chicago. There have been a couple of girls that transferred to SPVB and Fusion from Sting (Mohr and Gostomski) in the past couple of years but they both live closer to the border so it is an equal drive for them to get to Milwaukee or Aurora
|
|
|
Post by vbzinger on May 4, 2016 10:20:42 GMT -5
Agreed. Having seen all three of those (Sting) setters play this year, next year is going to be very interesting however it pans out. Will they all stay at Sting? Are there other clubs, they would consider (including Chicago area) for playtime and roles? No reason Wucherer and Mosher would leave, both have already verbally committed and as mentioned have siblings in the program, which leaves Zepecki. Zepecki has been the solid rock on a somewhat troubling 17s team for Sting, I don't foresee Mosher or Wucherer having any desire to play with that age. My money is they'll run some modified form of a 6-2 next year, which means they would both need to turn on the heat in terms of hitting, as there are already some heavy hitters on the 16 gold team.
|
|
|
Post by dp02838 on May 5, 2016 10:06:07 GMT -5
we should all know that carlini was the #1 recruit. This idea that setters aren' top 10 recruits is baseless, this past year both SSS and Poulter were top 10, Poulter #3, Carlni and Collins in 2013, Bugg and Strehlow in 2012, Mcneil and Moenoa in 2011. I do agree that hitters get far more attention, but I think a setter that is refined and shows a lot of potential will get the attention they deserve. Yes, the statement wasn't about whether they are top ten players or if they do crack the top ten, because I clearly pointed out that they can. What I said was setters cannot be raw athletes and crack the top ten. Hitters can. Basically a setter ranked in the 20s-30s probably has a a better Vball iq and is just an overall better volleyball player than the more raw top 10 hitters. The raw hitters are up there because of their potential though, I know.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on May 5, 2016 10:56:25 GMT -5
we should all know that carlini was the #1 recruit. This idea that setters aren' top 10 recruits is baseless, this past year both SSS and Poulter were top 10, Poulter #3, Carlni and Collins in 2013, Bugg and Strehlow in 2012, Mcneil and Moenoa in 2011. I do agree that hitters get far more attention, but I think a setter that is refined and shows a lot of potential will get the attention they deserve. Yes, the statement wasn't about whether they are top ten players or if they do crack the top ten, because I clearly pointed out that they can. What I said was setters cannot be raw athletes and crack the top ten. Hitters can. Basically a setter ranked in the 20s-30s probably has a a better Vball iq and is just an overall better volleyball player than the more raw top 10 hitters. The raw hitters are up there because of their potential though, I know. What's the point? Setting is a skill position, hitting relies a lot on physicality. There are plenty of unranked or very lowly-ranked hitters who probably have better VB IQ and are overall better volleyball players than highly-ranked setters, they're just short.
|
|