Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2006 14:48:48 GMT -5
Oh. Another thing. It's the GW Bush poll. Once you make a mistake, whatever you do don't correct it! Just pretend you were right all along.
Staying the course, with the AVCA...
|
|
|
Post by The Bofa on the Sofa on Oct 9, 2006 14:52:11 GMT -5
People don't want to listen to me... The worse part about the poll is that it rewards easy schedules... That's not the poll's fault, it is the attitude that "as long as they win, they deserve to stay" view. See the Why is Nebraska #1 thread. The rationale is not based on anything they have done to show they are good, but solely on the fact that they were #1 to start the season, and have not lost. IOW, the discussion reinforces the system of where you were last week and punishment that is endemic to all rankings polls. You are going to have to change the attitude that "as long as you win" you are ok. Pablo, of course, has no such qualms. As a result, Minnesta and Purdue basically traded places this week, despite the fact that Purdue won twice and Minnesota lost once.
|
|
|
Post by edburby on Oct 9, 2006 15:11:44 GMT -5
This is the WORST poll I've seen from the AVCA in a long time.
Hawaii, Wisc, OSU, and Minn were all placed wrong. Yikes. Again, how much influence does this poll have on NCAA seeding??
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Oct 9, 2006 15:13:58 GMT -5
This is the WORST poll I've seen from the AVCA in a long time. Hawaii, Wisc, OSU, and Minn were all placed wrong. Yikes. Again, how much influence does this poll have on NCAA seeding?? Not a lick.... and that's not necessarily a good thing..
|
|
|
Post by spikerthemovie on Oct 9, 2006 15:17:52 GMT -5
It is too a good thing. The more the NCAA seeders ignore the poll and look at -- oh, I don't know -- strength of schedule, mitigating factors in losses and wins, weak conferences that somehow got a free pass into the AVCA rankings despite only playing each other, etc. -- the better the brackets will be.
|
|
|
Post by beachman on Oct 9, 2006 15:22:58 GMT -5
I was right about Hawaii jumping 4 spots. How the hell do you move up 4 spots when you are PLAYING ABSOLUTELY NOBODY???
|
|
|
Post by beachman on Oct 9, 2006 15:23:52 GMT -5
On the road Minnesota beats a team that is ranked 10 spots above them and moves up one spot. I'm surprised they didn't go down. We didn't move up. Pepperdine fell out from above us, and no one else was there to fill the void. On the other hand, we got more than twice as many points/votes (277) as last week (120). Pepperdine has better quality losses than Hawaii has wins?
|
|
|
Post by spikerthemovie on Oct 9, 2006 15:30:17 GMT -5
I do think that's the biggest puzzle. As much as I agree that Minnesota should be about ten notches higher on the poll, I can at least see what's sticking in the voters' craws: five losses (and yes there are reasons for them and yes the NCAA penalties stuck and yes and yes). But the Hawaii thing is really idiotic, especially since there's no end in sight on their puffball schedule for the rest of the season.
|
|
|
Post by JT on Oct 9, 2006 15:34:42 GMT -5
Hawaii moved up because they didn't lose lose.
If teams above you lose, and you don't, they fall below you, and by default, you rise.
#10 LSU had to fall... lost to Alabama (Pablo rank #65) #11 Texas could (and did) rise up into 10th place. #12 Santa Clara had to fall... lost to Loyola Marymount (Pablo #45) #13 Wisconsin had to fall... lost to PSU and OSU #14 Ohio State had to fall... lost to Minnesota #15 Hawaii could (and did) rise. #16 Utah could (and did) rise, but there was no reason to have them rise above Hawaii. #17 Missouri could (and did) rise, but there was no reason to have them rise above Utah or Hawaii.
The only thing that could have been different would be for LSU to have fallen from 10th to 11th place. That would have left a vacuum that would only pull Hawaii up to 12th place.
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Oct 9, 2006 15:39:03 GMT -5
Rank | Team | Conference | Points | Record | Prev. Rank | Diff. | Prev. Points | Diff. | | 1 | Nebraska | Big 12 | 1476 | 15-0 | 1 | 0 | 1473 | 3 | | 2 | Penn State | Big 10 | 1451 | 17-0 | 2 | 0 | 1450 | 1 | | 3 | UCLA | Pac 10 | 1387 | 19-0 | 3 | 0 | 1391 | -4 | | 4 | USC | Pac 10 | 1325 | 17-0 | 4 | 0 | 1321 | 4 | | 5 | Washington | Pac 10 | 1252 | 14-3 | 5 | 0 | 1234 | 18 | | 6 | Stanford | Pac 10 | 1207 | 13-2 | 6 | 0 | 1210 | -3 | | 7 | California | Pac 10 | 1093 | 14-2 | 7 | 0 | 1142 | -49 | | 8 | Florida | SEC | 1089 | 14-2 | 8 | 0 | 1049 | 40 | | 9 | Purdue | Big 10 | 1016 | 15-2 | 9 | 0 | 953 | 63 | | 10 | Texas | Big 12 | 914 | 11-4 | 11 | 1 | 872 | 42 | | 11 | Hawaii | WAC | 744 | 11-4 | 15 | 4 | 641 | 103 | | 12 | Utah | Mountain West | 740 | 15-2 | 16 | 4 | 622 | 118 | | 13 | LSU | SEC | 727 | 15-2 | 10 | -3 | 910 | -183 | | 14 | Wisconsin | Big 10 | 645 | 12-4 | 13 | -1 | 778 | -133 | | 15 | Missouri | Big 12 | 629 | 13-4 | 17 | 2 | 500 | 129 | | 16 | Ohio State | Big 10 | 619 | 13-3 | 14 | -2 | 694 | -75 | | 17 | Santa Clara | West Coast | 607 | 12-4 | 12 | -5 | 825 | -218 | | 18 | Tennessee | SEC | 501 | 15-3 | 18 | 0 | 487 | 14 | | 19 | BYU | Mountain West | 426 | 15-2 | 19 | 0 | 439 | -13 | | 20 | Cal Poly | Big West | 410 | 13-4 | 20 | 0 | 398 | 12 | | 21 | Ohio | Mid America | 312 | 14-3 | 21 | 0 | 306 | 6 | | 22 | San Diego | West Coast | 285 | 14-4 | 22 | 0 | 186 | 99 | | 23 | Minnesota | Big 10 | 277 | 11-5 | 24 | 1 | 120 | 157 | | 24 | Oklahoma | Big 12 | 157 | 14-3 | 25 | 1 | 99 | 58 | | 25 | New Mexico State | WAC | 42 | 10-1 | 26 | 1 | 86 | -44 | | 26 | Duke | ACC | 31 | ? | 29 | 3 | 31 | 0 | | 27 | Pepperdine | West Coast | 27 | ? | 23 | -4 | 182 | -155 | | 28 | Loyola Marymount | West Coast | 23 | ? | 34 | 6 | 7 | 16 | | 29 | St. Johns | Big East | 20 | ? | 31 | 2 | 11 | 9 | | 30 | LBSU | Big West | 16 | ? | 28 | -2 | 14 | 2 | | 31 | Colorado | Big 12 | 11 | ? | 33 | 2 | 9 | 2 | | 32 | Sacramento State | Big Sky | 10 | ? | 30 | -2 | 11 | -1 | | 33 | Alabama | SEC | 9 | ? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | | 34 | Bowling Green | MAC | 4 | ? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | | 35 | Oregon | Pac 10 | 4 | ? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | | 36 | Saint Mary's | West Coast | 4 | ? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | | 37 | Baylor | Big 12 | 3 | ? | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Unlisted Points | 17 | | | | | | Total Points: | 19510 | | | | | | | | | | | Conference | Teams Ranked | Rank Diff. | Point Diff. | | | | | 1 | Pac 10 | 6 | 0 | -34 | | | | 2 | Big 12 | 6 | 6 | 234 | | | | 3 | Big 10 | 5 | -2 | 13 | | | | 4 | Big East | 1 | 2 | 9 | | | 5 | SEC | 4 | -3 | -129 | | | 6 | West Coast | 5 | -3 | -258 | | | 7 | Mountain West | 2 | -3 | 105 | | | 8 | Big West | 2 | -2 | 14 | | | 9 | WAC | 2 | 5 | 59 | | | 10 | Mid America | 1 | 0 | 6 | | | 11 | ACC | 1 | 3 | 0 | | | 12 | MAC | 1 | 0 | 0 | | | 13 | Big Sky | 1 | -2 | -1 | | | | Total Teams: | 37 | | | |
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Oct 9, 2006 15:42:45 GMT -5
Stop yer complainin'! The AVCA poll does not determine the champion.
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Oct 9, 2006 15:54:27 GMT -5
Purdue (+40), Hawaii (+63), and Texas (+42) beat unranked teams - including Purdue and Texas both being taken to 5 games by unranked teams and all three gain points.
New Mexico State loses 44 points but moves up a spot.
The Ohio / Cal Poly mixup from 2 weeks ago still hasn't been corrected.
Pepperdine is still getting votes but fell out of the top 25.
Alabama, Bowling Green,, Oregon, Saint Mary's, and Baylor (re)join the getting votes section.
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Oct 9, 2006 15:55:38 GMT -5
Stop yer complainin'! The AVCA poll does not determine the champion. Stop yer complainin about some unnamed poster complainin!
|
|
|
Post by IdahoBoy on Oct 9, 2006 15:56:28 GMT -5
I was right about Hawaii jumping 4 spots. How the hell do you move up 4 spots when you are PLAYING ABSOLUTELY NOBODY??? Easy, don't lose to a bunch of pansies like Long Beach does.
|
|
|
Post by The Bofa on the Sofa on Oct 9, 2006 16:21:20 GMT -5
The only thing that could have been different would be for LSU to have fallen from 10th to 11th place. That would have left a vacuum that would only pull Hawaii up to 12th place. LSU got sockered pretty hard here, but I'm not sure it is not out of the ordinary. When UNI lost to Bradley when UNI was ranked #7, they dropped below at least 4 teams, and it could have been as many as 6 (however, because other teams they dropped from 7 to 10). LSU took a hit of 5 spots here, so that is consistent with the previous treatment of highly ranked teams that lost ugly. It could have gone either way, I think, and not been too out of character.
|
|