|
Post by letch0125 on Dec 20, 2006 12:06:58 GMT -5
I think they lose on a neutral floor 3 out of 4 times. That's fine letch, but as I've said before, then all other non-neutral site champians now loose their champianship. Please inform them to mail back their rings. In fact, any game not at a neutral location will disqualify you from now on. To try to lessen a win because of that is just ridiculous if you don't do the above. I know I wouldn't be able to predict that, because they surprised me coming back down 2 in a neutral location. Wow - chill out. Thinking you protest a bit too much. The topic asks opinions on repeating in 07, not whether they deserved to win 06, and I gave my opinion on 07. I never said anything about anyone giving rings back or that holding a FF in Omaha that was won by Nebraska is any more/less wrong than if it's a home match for Stanford next year or any of the California teams who won on the west coast in years past. IN MY OPINION if the 2006 FF was played in Bangor, Maine, the results may have been different. I'm entitled to my opinion, and so are you, but there's no way to know, is there?
|
|
|
Post by clivehusker on Dec 20, 2006 12:30:32 GMT -5
Wow - chill out. Thinking you protest a bit too much. I was quite chilled. You seem to be the one getting bent out of shape. lol complain about staying on topic then see below. lol I know you didn't, I did. I said it because of how ridiculous it is mentioning it wasn't a neutral site, which you brought up, not me. If you make that type of arguement then you have to invalidate any non-neutral located match. And hmm a come back from two at a neutral site. No there isn't a way to tell. Oh and could you point out where I said you weren't entitled to your opinion... oh wait you can't, because I never said you weren't. lol, chill out indeed. lol
|
|