|
Post by volleybob on Oct 15, 2021 0:19:23 GMT -5
It's madden. If the UW loses it's because they suck. If they win it's because the team they played sucked. Every match, same old same old. Montana. State. To be fair I wasn’t even really trying to bash either of these teams but they both do have very serious issues that I think will be exploited in the tournament. You seem fixated.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 15, 2021 0:21:11 GMT -5
Washington in 3.....the last 3. Oh god, I don't think my heart could take that anymore. lol Just checking in. Are you still alive?
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 15, 2021 0:22:42 GMT -5
Another slow start for UW. Oregon's block is touching everything. not sure its quite a slow start, Oregon just has good defense In retrospect, I think you have to say that yes, it was a slow start.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 15, 2021 0:23:43 GMT -5
Still strikes me as awkward to have a down-ref make a call and then have to go to the video monitor to review her own call. I'm not saying the call on that touch/no touch was right or wrong, I just think having to review your own call is troubling. Not if the ref is honest.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 15, 2021 0:26:43 GMT -5
How does the AVCA see washington as a top 10 team??? Just calling back this one, because, well, you know why.
|
|
|
Post by volleybob on Oct 15, 2021 0:29:34 GMT -5
Worked again. Lose the first set. Win the match. Fifth time in a row. Not sure I’m down with losing the second set, too.
|
|
|
Post by NFRvb on Oct 15, 2021 0:48:14 GMT -5
How does the AVCA see washington as a top 10 team??? Just calling back this one, because, well, you know why. No my point still stands, they’re not one of the 10 best teams in the country. Neither is oregon
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Oct 15, 2021 1:12:21 GMT -5
Must really burn their cookies that UW actually won this one.
|
|
|
Post by Vball Fandom on Oct 15, 2021 1:20:16 GMT -5
I don't think Endsley was the problem. The whole UW defense was slow. Agree…quick trigger IMO!
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 15, 2021 1:22:19 GMT -5
I don't think Endsley was the problem. The whole UW defense was slow. Agree…quick trigger IMO! Except ... After Endsley came out and Bush came in, what happened?
|
|
|
Post by Vball Fandom on Oct 15, 2021 1:40:32 GMT -5
Except ... After Endsley came out and Bush came in, what happened? Uw lost the set. Emoni played well….no disrespect at all. But the key to UW coming to life had nothing to do with either Endsley or Bush…they started passing and controling the ball better…not to mention sharpened up their serving. Endsley hardly had a chance to break a sweat. If the trigger was that quick with some other players on the team, there would be an uproar by UW faithful.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 15, 2021 1:53:17 GMT -5
Endsley: 1K 2E 5A -.200 0BS 0BA 1BE (over 1 set) Basically, she got one kill and made three errors. -2 points.
Bush: 11K 1E 20A .500 0BS 1BA 1BE (over 4 sets) She got 11 kills, was in on a block, and made two errors. 9.5 points
You just can not reasonably spin this that Bush didn't massively outperform Endsley in this match.
|
|
|
Post by Vball Fandom on Oct 15, 2021 2:09:21 GMT -5
Endsley: 1K 2E 5A -.200 0BS 0BA 1BE (over 1 set) Basically, she got one kill and made three errors. -2 points. Bush: 11K 1E 20A .500 0BS 1BA 1BE (over 4 sets) She got 11 kills, was in on a block, and made two errors. 9.5 points You just can not reasonably spin this that Bush didn't massively outperform Endsley in this match. I did not say that. But you cant reasonably say 5 attempts is comparable to 20. Endsley had 2 errors…one of which was actually a touch the talented ref reversed her original call on. So the 2 errors should have been 1…and the 1 kill should have been 2…but that is not my point. BTW, it was a touch…I was there and everyone saw it but the ref on the replay. The other two “attempts” were defensive tips off of dieing inside sets due to poor passing. My original point that you jumped on was it was a quick trigger for her. I stand by that. That is hardly a fair chance, especially based on the way the rest of the team was playing. Emoni played well and am thrilled about that and the win! Just not thrilled they were so quick on Endsley. I faith in that kid based on last years success and role with the team that went to the final four. Honestly, I think the lack of a consistent line up is the reason UW hasnt found their grove yet.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 15, 2021 2:13:38 GMT -5
Endsley: 1K 2E 5A -.200 0BS 0BA 1BE (over 1 set) Basically, she got one kill and made three errors. -2 points. Bush: 11K 1E 20A .500 0BS 1BA 1BE (over 4 sets) She got 11 kills, was in on a block, and made two errors. 9.5 points You just can not reasonably spin this that Bush didn't massively outperform Endsley in this match. I did not say that. But you cant reasonably say 5 attempts is comparable to 20. Endsley had 2 errors…one of which was actually a touch the talented ref reversed her original call on. So the 2 errors should have been 1…and the 1 kill should have been 2…but that is not my point. BTW, it was a touch…I was there and everyone saw it but the ref on the replay. The other two “attempts” were defensive tips off of dieing inside sets due to poor passing. My original point that you jumped on was it was a quick trigger for her. I stand by that. That is hardly a fair chance, especially based on the way the rest of the team was playing. Emoni played well and am thrilled about that and the win! Just not thrilled they were so quick on Endsley. I faith in that kid based on last years success and role with the team that went to the final four. Honestly, I think the lack of a consistent line up is the reason UW hasnt found their grove yet. 5 attempts in 1 set versus 20 attempts in 4 sets seems pretty comparable. I actually didn't even watch the first set, so I didn't see Endsley play. But these are just not good numbers for her, and they are exceptional numbers for Bush. UW got beaten pretty badly in the first set, almost won the second set, and then did win sets 3, 4, and 5. I certainly am not saying Endsley was the reason the Huskies started poorly. Correlation is not causation. But it's just a fact that they played better with Bush than with Endsley.
|
|
|
Post by Vball Fandom on Oct 15, 2021 2:20:12 GMT -5
I did not say that. But you cant reasonably say 5 attempts is comparable to 20. Endsley had 2 errors…one of which was actually a touch the talented ref reversed her original call on. So the 2 errors should have been 1…and the 1 kill should have been 2…but that is not my point. BTW, it was a touch…I was there and everyone saw it but the ref on the replay. The other two “attempts” were defensive tips off of dieing inside sets due to poor passing. My original point that you jumped on was it was a quick trigger for her. I stand by that. That is hardly a fair chance, especially based on the way the rest of the team was playing. Emoni played well and am thrilled about that and the win! Just not thrilled they were so quick on Endsley. I faith in that kid based on last years success and role with the team that went to the final four. Honestly, I think the lack of a consistent line up is the reason UW hasnt found their grove yet. 5 attempts in 1 set versus 20 attempts in 4 sets seems pretty comparable. I actually didn't even watch the first set, so I didn't see Endsley play. But these are just not good numbers for her, and they are exceptional numbers for Bush. UW got beaten pretty badly in the first set, almost won the second set, and then did win sets 3, 4, and 5. I certainly am not saying Endsley was the reason the Huskies started poorly. Correlation is not causation. But it's just a fact that they played better with Bush than with Endsley. Again…that wasnt my point.
|
|