|
|
Post by Longhorn20 on Oct 2, 2022 17:23:56 GMT -5
Agree. Also feel Maggie is just beginning to assert herself at OPP and you lose her in a 5-1. Maggie and Becca also compliment each other. It sure you’re really losing all that much. She is hitting .132 with just barely a kill per set. Orr is a very solid blocker and would probably provide as much offense and at a higher pct. I still think not having a true M1 who can kill the ball behind the setter is a big contributing reason they’re in the 6’2 Don’t need a slide if your Opp can hit a D ball👀 Just ignore me and my agenda to have Lauenstein play all 6 rotations. She’s just so dynamic. |
|
|
|
Post by scarletandcream on Oct 2, 2022 17:46:39 GMT -5
i’m curious, does anyone have stats on lauensteins aces per set in the time she’s actually been serving? or an ace percentage? seems like she’s been serving really well it's under stats on the huskers website. This season she has 12 SA, 13 SE. 0.27 aces per set (best on the team). I know those state are there, but her .27 aces per set isn’t accurate because half the time she hasn’t even been serving. I’d bet she has closer to .5 aces per set in the sets she has served. |
|
|
|
Post by tudbud on Oct 2, 2022 18:19:39 GMT -5
My love for both volleyball and soap operas is now wrapped up in a box with a big red bow. this 👆 lmao This is everything. |
|
|
|
Post by smartcookie on Oct 2, 2022 18:47:05 GMT -5
it's under stats on the huskers website. This season she has 12 SA, 13 SE. 0.27 aces per set (best on the team). I know those state are there, but her .27 aces per set isn’t accurate because half the time she hasn’t even been serving. I’d bet she has closer to .5 aces per set in the sets she has served. Ah I see what you mean. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I think Lauenstein started serving during set 2 of the game against Stanford, meaning she's served in 21 sets. With 12 SA this means 0.57 SA per set. |
|
|
|
Post by scarletandcream on Oct 2, 2022 20:29:10 GMT -5
I know those state are there, but her .27 aces per set isn’t accurate because half the time she hasn’t even been serving. I’d bet she has closer to .5 aces per set in the sets she has served. Ah I see what you mean. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I think Lauenstein started serving during set 2 of the game against Stanford, meaning she's served in 21 sets. With 12 SA this means 0.57 SA per set. Interesting! That would put her leading the B1G, but checking back at box scores, she served one ace and on error in the Ole Miss game. I don’t recall if she served at the games between that and Stanford, though. |
|
|
|
Post by smartcookie on Oct 2, 2022 21:46:41 GMT -5
Ah I see what you mean. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but I think Lauenstein started serving during set 2 of the game against Stanford, meaning she's served in 21 sets. With 12 SA this means 0.57 SA per set. Interesting! That would put her leading the B1G, but checking back at box scores, she served one ace and on error in the Ole Miss game. I don’t recall if she served at the games between that and Stanford, though. Admittedly I didn't look at the box scores, just went off memory - I forgot she served in the Ole Miss game. Hopefully someone can get the exact number - my guess is also somewhere around 0.5 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2022 8:36:36 GMT -5
I miss hames and her amazing defense I hope she heals fast😩 we need a highlight reel of her outstanding plays👏
|
|
|
|
Post by volleyaudience on Oct 3, 2022 10:54:19 GMT -5
10/02/2022
|
|
|
|
Post by volleyaudience on Oct 3, 2022 14:40:30 GMT -5
Anyone know what percentage of the spectators were for Nebraska at Maryland? They sounded loud.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilikecorn on Oct 3, 2022 20:41:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by volleyaudience on Oct 4, 2022 14:33:55 GMT -5
Alum Note
10/3/2022 Big Ten Co-Defensive Player of the Week
Megan Miller, Northwestern
She served to close out the first win for Northwestern against a ranked team in an away game, ever.
When I think of Megan, I think of the 2019 set with eleven straight serves she made as Nebraska came from way back to close out the five set win versus Minnesota.
|
|
|
|
Post by willswims117 on Oct 4, 2022 22:35:39 GMT -5
Here's the real question going forward for the team - Does the team stay in a 6-2 with the return of Hames? It seems obvious that a 6-2 with Hames and Evans is better than with Orr, but will Cook revert back to a 5-1. After the match vs. Maryland, Batenhorst showed signs of regaining her power while Krause faltered slightly. Cook seems set on keeping Batenhorst played, so it will be interesting to see if the 6-2 goes back to Hames and Evans or Hames to the 5-1 (with Whitney playing 6 rotations?). Lots of options moving forward.
|
|
|
|
Post by rjaege on Oct 5, 2022 2:58:27 GMT -5
Here's the real question going forward for the team - Does the team stay in a 6-2 with the return of Hames? It seems obvious that a 6-2 with Hames and Evans is better than with Orr, but will Cook revert back to a 5-1. After the match vs. Maryland, Batenhorst showed signs of regaining her power while Krause faltered slightly. Cook seems set on keeping Batenhorst played, so it will be interesting to see if the 6-2 goes back to Hames and Evans or Hames to the 5-1 (with Whitney playing 6 rotations?). Lots of options moving forward. If Coach Cook wants to retain both Krause and Batenhorst, then it seems a 6-2 system suits that. Ditto next year when they have even more frontline power coming in. |
|
|
|
Post by robocop21 on Oct 5, 2022 4:04:50 GMT -5
Here's the real question going forward for the team - Does the team stay in a 6-2 with the return of Hames? It seems obvious that a 6-2 with Hames and Evans is better than with Orr, but will Cook revert back to a 5-1. After the match vs. Maryland, Batenhorst showed signs of regaining her power while Krause faltered slightly. Cook seems set on keeping Batenhorst played, so it will be interesting to see if the 6-2 goes back to Hames and Evans or Hames to the 5-1 (with Whitney playing 6 rotations?). Lots of options moving forward. I really don’t see the 6-2 going anywhere this year. They’re the top the defensive team in the country, and that’s because of the 6-2. The real question for next year is who takes Kubiks spot as the 6 rotation outside? I love Madi and the time she’s put in but I’m hoping she moves on after this year for the new wave of talent coming through. I could absolutely see a 6-2 again though with Reilly and Evans. But also wouldn’t be shocked on a Reilly 5-1. |
|
|
|
Post by babybacksets on Oct 5, 2022 4:19:33 GMT -5
Here's the real question going forward for the team - Does the team stay in a 6-2 with the return of Hames? It seems obvious that a 6-2 with Hames and Evans is better than with Orr, but will Cook revert back to a 5-1. After the match vs. Maryland, Batenhorst showed signs of regaining her power while Krause faltered slightly. Cook seems set on keeping Batenhorst played, so it will be interesting to see if the 6-2 goes back to Hames and Evans or Hames to the 5-1 (with Whitney playing 6 rotations?). Lots of options moving forward. I really don’t see the 6-2 going anywhere this year. They’re the top the defensive team in the country, and that’s because of the 6-2. The real question for next year is who takes Kubiks spot as the 6 rotation outside? I love Madi and the time she’s put in but I’m hoping she moves on after this year for the new wave of talent coming through. I could absolutely see a 6-2 again though with Reilly and Evans. But also wouldn’t be shocked on a Reilly 5-1. Yes because Orr is as good as gone once that portal window opens up. |
|
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gray/W34E6WUZKNAYPJECX7XWMXTMRM.JPG)
