|
|
Post by pull3 on Oct 15, 2022 10:34:06 GMT -5
That seems to line up well with what Sheff said. It sounds like she’ll be inserted wherever there is a need, and not slot in only one spot.
Seems like Sheffield didn't like Franklin's serve, so he let Shanel play as long as the team could afford in order to keep her happy.
Boyer subbed for Franklin in set 1 at 24-24 can tell much of this theory.
Shanel wasn't eye flashing in the match.
The passes: The only 2 passes she received fell beyond the 10-foot line, with one resulting an awful body twisted set for MJ. The serves: One ace, one error, all other serves were 3.0 good for the opposite receivers. One dig: went 10 feet straight up.
That is my observation about Shanel of game #1. I expect she will do better at home.
|
|
|
|
Post by pull3 on Oct 15, 2022 11:10:34 GMT -5
repeated post pls ignore.
|
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Oct 15, 2022 11:35:46 GMT -5
That seems to line up well with what Sheff said. It sounds like she’ll be inserted wherever there is a need, and not slot in only one spot.
Seems like Sheffield didn't like Franklin's serve, so he let Shanel play as long as the team could afford in order to keep her happy.
Boyer subbed for Franklin in set 1 at 24-24 can tell much of this theory.
Shanel wasn't eye flashing in the match.
The passes: The only 2 passes she received fell beyond the 10 foot line, with one resulting an awful body twisted set for MJ. The serves: One ace, one error, all other serves were 3.0 good for the opposite receivers. One dig went 10 foot straight up.
That is my observation about Shanel of game #1.
The box score has Bramschreiber at zero aces, one error on serve. I have her at a sideout percentage of 0.429, four points won on seven total serves. Of course it was just a few serves, but a 0.429 sideout percent wins you a match every single time. The ball she served at 8-8 in the third set resulted in an overpass and kill for Crawford, so I don't think that got scored a "three". The sub of Boyer at 24-24 in the first set is interesting. It was the 13th sub used, and it leaves you with Boyer and Smrek and MJ on the floor. When Boyer was done, she subbed back out for Franklin, using sub #14. If Crawford hadn't manage to close out the set on her serve, then the next rotation would normally be Izzy coming back in for Smrek and Robinson for MJ. But you don't have the subs left to do that. So MJ would have stayed on as a "5-1" setter and Demps would have been sub #15 as the Smrek replacement and the opp for 5-1 MJ. |
|
|
|
Post by pull3 on Oct 15, 2022 11:46:57 GMT -5
Seems like Sheffield didn't like Franklin's serve, so he let Shanel play as long as the team could afford in order to keep her happy.
Boyer subbed for Franklin in set 1 at 24-24 can tell much of this theory.
Shanel wasn't eye flashing in the match.
The passes: The only 2 passes she received fell beyond the 10 foot line, with one resulting an awful body twisted set for MJ. The serves: One ace, one error, all other serves were 3.0 good for the opposite receivers. One dig went 10 foot straight up.
That is my observation about Shanel of game #1.
The box score has Bramschreiber at zero aces, one error on serve. I have her at a sideout percentage of 0.429, four points won on seven total serves. Of course it was just a few serves, but a 0.429 sideout percent wins you a match every single time. The ball she served at 8-8 in the third set resulted in an overpass and kill for Crawford, so I don't think that got scored a "three". The sub of Boyer at 24-24 in the first set is interesting. It was the 13th sub used, and it leaves you with Boyer and Smrek and MJ on the floor. When Boyer was done, she subbed back out for Franklin, using sub #14. If Crawford hadn't manage to close out the set on her serve, then the next rotation would normally be Izzy coming back in for Smrek and Robinson for MJ. But you don't have the subs left to do that. So MJ would have stayed on as a "5-1" setter and Demps would have been sub #15 as the Smrek replacement and the opp for 5-1 MJ. You are right. She got an overpass which I forgot. She got an ace.The stat was not correct. |
|
|
|
Post by pull3 on Oct 15, 2022 11:55:39 GMT -5
Seems like Sheffield didn't like Franklin's serve, so he let Shanel play as long as the team could afford in order to keep her happy.
Boyer subbed for Franklin in set 1 at 24-24 can tell much of this theory.
Shanel wasn't eye flashing in the match.
The passes: The only 2 passes she received fell beyond the 10 foot line, with one resulting an awful body twisted set for MJ. The serves: One ace, one error, all other serves were 3.0 good for the opposite receivers. One dig went 10 foot straight up.
That is my observation about Shanel of game #1.
The box score has Bramschreiber at zero aces, one error on serve. I have her at a sideout percentage of 0.429, four points won on seven total serves. Of course it was just a few serves, but a 0.429 sideout percent wins you a match every single time. The ball she served at 8-8 in the third set resulted in an overpass and kill for Crawford, so I don't think that got scored a "three". The sub of Boyer at 24-24 in the first set is interesting. It was the 13th sub used, and it leaves you with Boyer and Smrek and MJ on the floor. When Boyer was done, she subbed back out for Franklin, using sub #14. If Crawford hadn't manage to close out the set on her serve, then the next rotation would normally be Izzy coming back in for Smrek and Robinson for MJ. But you don't have the subs left to do that. So MJ would have stayed on as a "5-1" setter and Demps would have been sub #15 as the Smrek replacement and the opp for 5-1 MJ. You are right. She got an overpass which I forgot. She got an ace.The stat was not correct. edit: nevermind.I must have thought GG's ace was her. this all come from the memory. |
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Oct 15, 2022 12:00:05 GMT -5
The box score has Bramschreiber at zero aces, one error on serve. I have her at a sideout percentage of 0.429, four points won on seven total serves. Of course it was just a few serves, but a 0.429 sideout percent wins you a match every single time. The ball she served at 8-8 in the third set resulted in an overpass and kill for Crawford, so I don't think that got scored a "three". The sub of Boyer at 24-24 in the first set is interesting. It was the 13th sub used, and it leaves you with Boyer and Smrek and MJ on the floor. When Boyer was done, she subbed back out for Franklin, using sub #14. If Crawford hadn't manage to close out the set on her serve, then the next rotation would normally be Izzy coming back in for Smrek and Robinson for MJ. But you don't have the subs left to do that. So MJ would have stayed on as a "5-1" setter and Demps would have been sub #15 as the Smrek replacement and the opp for 5-1 MJ. You are right. She got an overpass which I forgot. She got an ace.The stat was not correct. In the second set, she served three balls that turned into Badger blocks, and her fourth serve was a kill by Iowa's Amiya Jones. In her first turn at the line in the third set, she served the overpass-kill, and then Iowa's Audrey Black got the kill. Her second turn at the line in the third set was the service error. She did not have an ace. |
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Oct 15, 2022 12:16:12 GMT -5
As long as I was watching for the first time this morning, I tried to note the backrow attacks. I could *certainly* have missed some attempts, concentration wandering to other things happening in the match, etc. I double-checked kills and errors in the play-by-play, but there's no way to double-check an attempt that I might have missed in the play-by-play.
For all the talk about backrow attacks, at least last night, they were quite underwhelming:
Orzol has one kill, three errors, on nine attempts, -0.222
Franklin was two kills, one error, on six swings, 0.167
Together, three kills, four errors, fifteen attempts, -0.067
Just one night, and no quantifying the effect it might have on the Iowa block and all they have to think about, etc. But still...
----------------------
(Adding, Orzol hit .241 for the match. Without the backrow attempts, she would have been 10 kills, 1 error, on 20 swings, a 0.450 percentage.)
|
|
|
|
Post by ndodge on Oct 15, 2022 17:01:10 GMT -5
Some back row sets were safe OOS outlets though where it seemed the hitters weren’t really trying to get a kill necessarily. A nice option rather than always pushing left OOS
|
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Oct 15, 2022 17:27:33 GMT -5
Some back row sets were safe OOS outlets though where it seemed the hitters weren’t really trying to get a kill necessarily. A nice option rather than always pushing left OOS No matter how many safe OOS balls, it was still more errors than kills. |
|
|
|
Post by tablealgebra on Oct 16, 2022 2:28:10 GMT -5
Some back row sets were safe OOS outlets though where it seemed the hitters weren’t really trying to get a kill necessarily. A nice option rather than always pushing left OOS No matter how many safe OOS balls, it was still more errors than kills. After they were so wildly successful against Purdue with them, seemed like they forced it a bit against Iowa. In particular, one I remember where Izzy had it within 3 feet of the net and set the pipe; there's no reason there not to either set middle or fire a go out to the left pin. |
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Oct 16, 2022 9:38:06 GMT -5
No matter how many safe OOS balls, it was still more errors than kills. After they were so wildly successful against Purdue with them, seemed like they forced it a bit against Iowa. In particular, one I remember where Izzy had it within 3 feet of the net and set the pipe; there's no reason there not to either set middle or fire a go out to the left pin. Yesterday when I was thinking how to double-checking the backrow kills and errors I noted in the video of the Iowa match, I realized I could plow through the 'play-by-play' of the match, find a kill/error from Franklin/Orzol and then infer from who the most recent UW server was whether the hitter was front or back row at that time. I wouldn't want to do that for 15 matches, but this morning I was able to go through the play-by-play of the Purdue match relatively quickly (relative to two hours of video, that is :-). It doesn't get you a hitting percentage, but kills-to-errors is pretty good. Indeed, it was successful during the Purdue match! Franklin had seven backrow kills to two errors, and Orzol had 5 backrow kills to one error. Let's hope for that kind of ratio today! |
|
|
|
Post by pull3 on Oct 16, 2022 14:49:31 GMT -5
Not sure how other teams are doing, but rooting Franklin for PoW with 20 and 16 kills.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wiswell on Oct 16, 2022 16:31:46 GMT -5
Not sure how other teams are doing, but rooting Franklin for PoW with 20 and 16 kills. Her hitting percentage today wasn't great, but it did improve the last half of the match. But Friday she but something like . 600! |
|
|
|
Post by buckyupbuttercup on Oct 16, 2022 17:44:57 GMT -5
I continue to feel pretty good about the badgers go-forward prospects. Passing has improved. They are getting hitting from multiple sources. With smrek back, the block is consistent and formidable. Really need the setting to take the next step forward now. Even with good passing, there are still too many timing and placement issues for both setters. They really don't have a lot of experience yet, so optimism that they will continue to improve certainly still seems warranted.
I have to assume it was coaching direction to push the backrow attacks. Perfected passes set to the backrow for way too many tips, at the expense of any middle attack, was tough today.
|
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Oct 16, 2022 18:00:17 GMT -5
Michigan match, points by setter by set:
Izzy on the court: 16-16, 14-10, 12-12, 12-10; total 54-48
MJ on the court: 13-10, 12-7, 10-9; total 47-42
-----------
Points scored during the serve of server:
Izzy: 5 points scored, 9 times serve lost
Orzol: 7 points scored, 11 times serve lost
GG: 5 points scored, 11 times serve lost
MJ: 5 points scored, 11 times serve lost
Franklin: 6 points scored, 3 times serve lost
Liz G: 2 points scored, 5 times serve lost
CC: 6 points scored, 5 times serve lost
Demps: 0 points won, 1 time serve lost
Bram: 4 points scored, 5 times serve lost
-----------
Sideout percents by server for the year in B1G matches (lower number the better):
Izzy: 0.516
Orzol: 0.613
GG: 0.574
MJ: 0.568
Franklin: 0.565
Liz G: 0.525
CC: 0.596
Bram: 0.500
Boyer: 0.667
Demps: 1.00 (two time to the line)
AnnaMac: 1.00 (one time to the line)
|
|
