|
Post by hipsterfilth on Sept 1, 2022 10:12:27 GMT -5
As you insert yourself into the discussion.
Also, to be fair, it was like one person talking to himself and I decided to give him an audience. I think that's a very polite thing to do. But, I wasn't the one who so rudely told another poster to mind their own business (on a public message board). That was ALL you. Sorry if I offended you.
|
|
|
Post by Logan Tom Fan on Sept 1, 2022 10:23:58 GMT -5
FLECK
|
|
|
Post by BigDigEnergy on Sept 1, 2022 10:30:43 GMT -5
Passing stats are up: Skinner 8 attempts - 1.31 - 25.0 GP % Akana 14 attempts - 1.64 - 28.6 GP% Eggleston 10 attempts - 2.0 - 40 GP% Halter 16 attempts - 2.16 - 50 GP% Fleck 20 attempts - 2.52 - 70 GP% (lol she's so ridiculous) Kilkelly 19 attempts - 1.45 - 26.3 GP% McGraw 27 attempts - 2.20 - 63.0 GP% Wenaas 32 attempts - 2.22 - 59.4 GP% Landfair 9 attempts - 2.56 - 77.8 GP% The OHs passing attempts and grades for Texas vs. Gopher are something! Also Landfair.
|
|
|
Post by courtwatchers on Sept 1, 2022 10:35:28 GMT -5
Passing stats are up: Skinner 8 attempts - 1.31 - 25.0 GP % Akana 14 attempts - 1.64 - 28.6 GP% Eggleston 10 attempts - 2.0 - 40 GP% Halter 16 attempts - 2.16 - 50 GP% Fleck 20 attempts - 2.52 - 70 GP% (lol she's so ridiculous) Kilkelly 19 attempts - 1.45 - 26.3 GP% McGraw 27 attempts - 2.20 - 63.0 GP% Wenaas 32 attempts - 2.22 - 59.4 GP% Landfair 9 attempts - 2.56 - 77.8 GP% Well, after seeing these figures and watching the match, it just solidifies the outcome. There was no doubt during the match that Fleck was the best Defensive player on the court. Landfair....you go girl!
|
|
|
Post by gopherhim on Sept 1, 2022 10:43:14 GMT -5
just enjoy the good volleyball and stop being so shiddy about everything. This quote will be my first tattoo. Tastefully across the lower back.
|
|
|
Post by dl3ww on Sept 1, 2022 11:01:47 GMT -5
Do y’all think Texas should’ve targeted landfair more? Or would she just have stuck it out and passed great all night? She was too hot to at least not to try to wear out
|
|
|
Post by basil on Sept 1, 2022 11:05:48 GMT -5
Do y’all think Texas should’ve targeted landfair more? Or would she just have stuck it out and passed great all night? She was too hot to at least not to try to wear out do that and maybe Wenaas suddenly starts swinging much more freely I don't know the exact stats so I'm speculating: Landfair might be the weaker passer but it doesn't necessarily affect her attacking whereas Wenaas might be the better passer but the more she has to pass it affects her offense just a guess, fun to think about
|
|
|
Post by dl3ww on Sept 1, 2022 11:11:56 GMT -5
Do y’all think Texas should’ve targeted landfair more? Or would she just have stuck it out and passed great all night? She was too hot to at least not to try to wear out do that and maybe Wenaas suddenly starts swinging much more freely I don't know the exact stats so I'm speculating: Landfair might be the weaker passer but it doesn't necessarily affect her attacking whereas Wenaas might be the better passer but the more she has to pass it affects her offense just a guess, fun to think about Yea ig that is the case I just also feel like McGraw got a lot of serves at her as well, I was thinking some of those should’ve went to Landfair.. I feel like Fleck especially was targeting McGraw all night💀
|
|
|
Post by vollem on Sept 1, 2022 11:15:03 GMT -5
do that and maybe Wenaas suddenly starts swinging much more freely I don't know the exact stats so I'm speculating: Landfair might be the weaker passer but it doesn't necessarily affect her attacking whereas Wenaas might be the better passer but the more she has to pass it affects her offense just a guess, fun to think about Yea ig that is the case I just also feel like McGraw got a lot of serves at her as well, I was thinking some of those should’ve went to Landfair.. I feel like Fleck especially was targeting McGraw all night💀 Similar to how Fleck had 20 attempts, I don't think either libero were purposfully targetted, they just covered more ground and poached seams.A good, aggressive libero should be able to do that.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 1, 2022 12:02:40 GMT -5
Meh. Texas recruits well with or without the portal. It’s Elliott’s thing, and if recruiting evolves to include the portal, what of it? Elliott doesn’t collect players as much as they choose to be collected. We can play shoulda coulda woulda with the portal as much as we want but the fact is Texas will always have and attract top talent, regardless of how he develops them. Even out of high school, players can get over recruited at places like Texas, and a couple others. Would you say it was ruining the sport if a certain school kept getting top 5 recruiting classes year after year? If Texas recruits so well WITHOUT the portal then how come 5 out of the 6 players (!) on court against Ohio State at times were from UCLA, Nebraska, Kentucky, Utah, and Cal? Texas definitely recruits well. Congrats. And Texas would still be one of the top teams without the portal. But come onnnn. The portal unlimited transfer situation this year is ridiculous and cries out for some reasonable adjustment to more fairly distribute the talent. Either limit how many any given team can take or how many can play in a given year. I'd say 2 would be fair and about right. Besides, we don't want you horns fans to look even more schadenfreude-ly ridiculous if you STILL can't win the national championship this year. We care... I think this misses the mark. Would you have the same opinion if all the transfers didn’t actually start? I doubt it. A number of teams use the transfer portal to fill gaps in the roster. Limiting it to two would hurt lots of programs who are nowhere as good as Texas. College sports has always been an area where insane collections of talent can manifest because players can choose to go anywhere they want without restriction. The elite programs have had stacked rosters year in and year out for decades. I don’t seem to understand why Texas this year should be viewed any differently. The transfer portal isn’t new.
|
|
|
Post by babybacksets on Sept 1, 2022 12:21:56 GMT -5
Passing stats are up: Skinner 8 attempts - 1.31 - 25.0 GP % Akana 14 attempts - 1.64 - 28.6 GP% Eggleston 10 attempts - 2.0 - 40 GP% Halter 16 attempts - 2.16 - 50 GP% Fleck 20 attempts - 2.52 - 70 GP% (lol she's so ridiculous) Kilkelly 19 attempts - 1.45 - 26.3 GP% McGraw 27 attempts - 2.20 - 63.0 GP% Wenaas 32 attempts - 2.22 - 59.4 GP% Landfair 9 attempts - 2.56 - 77.8 GP% This is honestly so annoying see I really didn’t want to buy into the notion of Shaffmaster being the main limiting factor on this Minnesota team but that’s truly not that bad of a passing line (besides Kilkelly who I’ve always been meh about)😩
|
|
|
Post by B1GHuskerGuy on Sept 1, 2022 12:23:17 GMT -5
This was fun to read on the lunch break. Thanks y’all!!
|
|
|
Post by nellynel on Sept 1, 2022 12:25:16 GMT -5
If Texas recruits so well WITHOUT the portal then how come 5 out of the 6 players (!) on court against Ohio State at times were from UCLA, Nebraska, Kentucky, Utah, and Cal? Texas definitely recruits well. Congrats. And Texas would still be one of the top teams without the portal. But come onnnn. The portal unlimited transfer situation this year is ridiculous and cries out for some reasonable adjustment to more fairly distribute the talent. Either limit how many any given team can take or how many can play in a given year. I'd say 2 would be fair and about right. Besides, we don't want you horns fans to look even more schadenfreude-ly ridiculous if you STILL can't win the national championship this year. We care... I think this misses the mark. Would you have the same opinion if all the transfers didn’t actually start? I doubt it. A number of teams use the transfer portal to fill gaps in the roster. Limiting it to two would hurt lots of programs who are nowhere as good as Texas. College sports has always been an area where insane collections of talent can manifest because players can choose to go anywhere they want without restriction. The elite programs have had stacked rosters year in and year out for decades. I don’t seem to understand why Texas this year should be viewed any differently. The transfer portal isn’t new. Can someone refresh the transfer tea thread so all the drama queens who breathlessly waited and hoped to see if their team would get a player in the portal to help them become a better team can cleanse their souls of what ever garbage their posting now. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 1, 2022 12:33:18 GMT -5
I think this misses the mark. Would you have the same opinion if all the transfers didn’t actually start? I doubt it. A number of teams use the transfer portal to fill gaps in the roster. Limiting it to two would hurt lots of programs who are nowhere as good as Texas. College sports has always been an area where insane collections of talent can manifest because players can choose to go anywhere they want without restriction. The elite programs have had stacked rosters year in and year out for decades. I don’t seem to understand why Texas this year should be viewed any differently. The transfer portal isn’t new. Can someone refresh the transfer tea thread so all the drama queens who breathlessly waited and hoped to see if their team would get a player in the portal to help them become a better team can cleanse their souls of what ever garbage their posting now. Thanks Is this supposed to be a dig at me? I don’t recall ever suggesting that Texas shouldn’t be allowed to get transfers or have stacked teams or whatever.
|
|
|
Post by give me the og-ball-u on Sept 1, 2022 12:38:15 GMT -5
Passing stats are up: Fleck 20 attempts - 2.52 - 70 GP% (lol she's so ridiculous) she poached a good number of those passes too like
|
|