moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 13:37:58 GMT -5
Fox is part of the media. Fox is the one accused in court of playing fast and loose with the facts to create a narrative that you want to hear, repeating things they know are false and holding back information that would contradict what you want to believe. The Tucker Carlson show has already declared in court not to believe what he says, yet you are excited to hear what he says, since you are one of "his people". You essentially repeated what I said, that you are excited to be knowingly lied to, yet you you called me (and others) a liar. You are naive, uninformed and frankly rude and unable to control yourself in a civil manner. You are definitely "his people". You are proud of that. That is a very bad sign. We don't need people like you feed even more lies because it keeps you watching. You want just your propaganda to be on the news. You’re just as bad as Getty. I can’t wait until the footage comes out. My guess is you’ll see a policeman actually open the doors for people. You’ll see all kinds of things that of course never saw the light of day when corrupt Nancy was in charge. So evidently you’re not interested in the entire story. You people are so crooked it’s sad. How do you reconcile Hannity, Ingrams, Tucker etc all selling the idea that the 2020 election was rigged when emails and texts show they all felt otherwise? To be clear do you defend the Fox News lying? |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 13:44:41 GMT -5
You want just your propaganda to be on the news. You’re just as bad as Getty. I can’t wait until the footage comes out. My guess is you’ll see a policeman actually open the doors for people. You’ll see all kinds of things that of course never saw the light of day when corrupt Nancy was in charge. So evidently you’re not interested in the entire story. You people are so crooked it’s sad. How do you reconcile Hannity, Ingrams, Tucker etc all selling the idea that the 2020 election was rigged when emails and texts show they all felt otherwise? To be clear do you defend the Fox News lying? That’s interesting, I watch them often and I’ve never heard any of them say that |
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 13:51:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 14:00:33 GMT -5
I agree, I also agree that people should have legal action taken against them that perpetuated that Donald Trump was a Russian spy. I think those people should be taken to court .Because obviously what you hate is the lie right? That’s what makes you the most upset? Suffering since when Adam Schiff said that he had proof that Donald Trump was a Russian asset he too should be taken to the cleaners? I’m so glad you’re all for punishing liars. |
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 14:05:43 GMT -5
I agree, I also agree that people should have legal action taken against them that perpetuated that Donald Trump was a Russian spy. I think those people should be taken to court .Because obviously what you hate is the lie right? That’s what makes you the most upset? Suffering since when Adam Schiff said that he had proof that Donald Trump was a Russian asset he too should be taken to the cleaners? I’m so glad you’re all for punishing liars. Mueller found evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Durham spent several years and found there were NO people who should have legal action taken against them. So your deflection is a big swing and a miss. |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 14:07:37 GMT -5
I agree, I also agree that people should have legal action taken against them that perpetuated that Donald Trump was a Russian spy. I think those people should be taken to court .Because obviously what you hate is the lie right? That’s what makes you the most upset? Suffering since when Adam Schiff said that he had proof that Donald Trump was a Russian asset he too should be taken to the cleaners? I’m so glad you’re all for punishing liars. Mueller found evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Durham spent several years and found there were NO people who should have legal action taken against them. So your deflection is a big swing and a miss. He did not find that at all you liar. They found Paul Manafort had done business with Russia in the past. Which he did frequently. It wasn’t a big shocker. Didn’t Hunter Biden get several hundred thousand dollars from a Russian oligarch ? Does that make him a Russian asset? Sit down. |
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Feb 23, 2023 14:11:27 GMT -5
Mueller found evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Durham spent several years and found there were NO people who should have legal action taken against them. So your deflection is a big swing and a miss. He did not find that at all you liar. They found Paul Manafort had done business with Russia in the past. Which he did frequently. It wasn’t a big shocker. Didn’t Hunter Biden get several hundred thousand dollars from a Russian oligarch ? Does that make him a Russian asset? Sit down. It is true. Manafort's long-time business associate was Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian intelligence officer, who fled to Russia to avoid prosecution. Trump then pardoned Manafort. That's so sleazy of Trump. |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 14:12:42 GMT -5
He did not find that at all you liar. They found Paul Manafort had done business with Russia in the past. Which he did frequently. It wasn’t a big shocker. Didn’t Hunter Biden get several hundred thousand dollars from a Russian oligarch ? Does that make him a Russian asset? Sit down. It is true. Manafort's long-time business associate was Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian intelligence officer, who fled to Russia to avoid prosecution. Trump then pardoned Manafort. That's so sleazy of Trump. Longtime business associate is the operative word and thank you for admitting that. Case closed. And not one mixed metaphor. |
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 14:16:05 GMT -5
Mueller found evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Durham spent several years and found there were NO people who should have legal action taken against them. So your deflection is a big swing and a miss. He did not find that at all you liar. They found Paul Manafort had done business with Russia in the past. Which he did frequently. It wasn’t a big shocker. Didn’t Hunter Biden get several hundred thousand dollars from a Russian oligarch ? Does that make him a Russian asset? Sit down. sorry hoolie, In 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President.[5] Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent. Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”[6] Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.”[7] A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.[8] The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering. The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election. The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia. |
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Feb 23, 2023 14:18:27 GMT -5
It is true. Manafort's long-time business associate was Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian intelligence officer, who fled to Russia to avoid prosecution. Trump then pardoned Manafort. That's so sleazy of Trump. Longtime business associate is the operative word and thank you for admitting that. Case closed. And not one mixed metaphor. He was still Manafort's business associate when Manafort was managing Trump's campaign. Case re-opened. And then Trump announced a pardon of Steve Bannon for defrauding people for a phoney fund-raiser for The Wall just hours before leaving office. What a swell guy Trump is, selling out his supporters. |
|
|
|
Post by BearClause on Feb 23, 2023 14:49:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Feb 23, 2023 15:07:10 GMT -5
Giving sole access of the tapes to a serial propagandist who has already made multiple deceptive and/or outright false statements about 1/6? Why, whatever could go wrong? Fortunately, congressional Democrats also have full access to the videos, and would presumably be able to use them to rebut any cherry picked or edited footage appearing on Tucker’s show. Not that the frozen food heir would ever stoop that low, of course! LOL. Isn’t that exactly what Nancy Pelosi did? Released whatever looked terrible to the press and of course they were more than happy to share it you absolute hypocrite? So you don’t want any propaganda to go the other way. Just the propaganda that you believe. Nancy Pelosi had nothing to do with releasing video, you nitwit. The bipartisan 1/6 committee released video - after, I should add, having it reviewed by the Capital Police to ensure security wasn't compromised. I can pretty much guarantee that Tucker Carlson will not apply any such safeguards. It's patently obvious what's happening here. McCarthy handed over the video to Tucker Carlson for one reason: to re-tell the events of January 6th Fox-style. But I'm thinking McCarthy likely didn't know that ranking members of congressional committees (that would be Democrats) can also request and receive the same video, because Kevin isn't a guy who does his homework - not to mention he's pretty stupid. If I'm the Dems, I'm putting together a "misinformation war room" of sorts, ready to counter what is almost certainly going to be a distortion of the facts from that day on the part of TC by inviting every major news outlet and fact-checkers to review accurate, in-context information and video. |
|
|
|
Post by mervinswerved on Feb 23, 2023 15:11:28 GMT -5
If I'm the Dems, I'm putting together a "misinformation war room" of sorts, ready to counter what is almost certainly going to be a distortion of the facts from that day on the part of TC by inviting every major news outlet and fact-checkers to review accurate, in-context information and video. If Democrats were smart, they'd open a propaganda TV network of their own. |
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Feb 23, 2023 15:21:07 GMT -5
If I'm the Dems, I'm putting together a "misinformation war room" of sorts, ready to counter what is almost certainly going to be a distortion of the facts from that day on the part of TC by inviting every major news outlet and fact-checkers to review accurate, in-context information and video. If Democrats were smart, they'd open a propaganda TV network of their own. Isn't that what CNN, MSNBC, and CNBC are for? |
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 15:23:51 GMT -5
If Democrats were smart, they'd open a propaganda TV network of their own. Isn't that what CNN, MSNBC, and CNBC are for? No, that would be a Trump useful idiot’s response to merv’s post. |
|
