|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 15:24:54 GMT -5
Isn’t that exactly what Nancy Pelosi did? Released whatever looked terrible to the press and of course they were more than happy to share it you absolute hypocrite? So you don’t want any propaganda to go the other way. Just the propaganda that you believe. Nancy Pelosi had nothing to do with releasing video, you nitwit. The bipartisan 1/6 committee released video - after, I should add, having it reviewed by the Capital Police to ensure security wasn't compromised. I can pretty much guarantee that Tucker Carlson will not apply any such safeguards. It's patently obvious what's happening here. McCarthy handed over the video to Tucker Carlson for one reason: to re-tell the events of January 6th Fox-style. But I'm thinking McCarthy likely didn't know that ranking members of congressional committees (that would be Democrats) can also request and receive the same video, because Kevin isn't a guy who does his homework - not to mention he's pretty stupid. If I'm the Dems, I'm putting together a "misinformation war room" of sorts, ready to counter what is almost certainly going to be a distortion of the facts from that day on the part of TC by inviting every major news outlet and fact-checkers to review accurate, in-context information and video. I think you nose just grew a foot Pinocchio. Bi-partisan? Where they kicked off Jim Jordan and left crying Adam and Liz Cheney? Oh my god....this has to be one of your most stupid posts ever. |
|
|
|
Post by mervinswerved on Feb 23, 2023 15:26:41 GMT -5
If Democrats were smart, they'd open a propaganda TV network of their own. Isn't that what CNN, MSNBC, and CNBC are for? No? |
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 15:28:50 GMT -5
Nancy Pelosi had nothing to do with releasing video, you nitwit. The bipartisan 1/6 committee released video - after, I should add, having it reviewed by the Capital Police to ensure security wasn't compromised. I can pretty much guarantee that Tucker Carlson will not apply any such safeguards. It's patently obvious what's happening here. McCarthy handed over the video to Tucker Carlson for one reason: to re-tell the events of January 6th Fox-style. But I'm thinking McCarthy likely didn't know that ranking members of congressional committees (that would be Democrats) can also request and receive the same video, because Kevin isn't a guy who does his homework - not to mention he's pretty stupid. If I'm the Dems, I'm putting together a "misinformation war room" of sorts, ready to counter what is almost certainly going to be a distortion of the facts from that day on the part of TC by inviting every major news outlet and fact-checkers to review accurate, in-context information and video. I think you nose just grew a foot Pinocchio. Bi-partisan? Where they kicked off Jim Jordan and left crying Adam and Liz Cheney? Oh my god....this has to be one of your most stupid posts ever. Jim Jordan was never kicked off the 1/6 committee. He was never accepted on it. Jordan should have never been a part of it. As a matter of fact Republican leadership refused a bipartisan committee. |
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 15:30:36 GMT -5
Nancy Pelosi had nothing to do with releasing video, you nitwit. The bipartisan 1/6 committee released video - after, I should add, having it reviewed by the Capital Police to ensure security wasn't compromised. I can pretty much guarantee that Tucker Carlson will not apply any such safeguards. It's patently obvious what's happening here. McCarthy handed over the video to Tucker Carlson for one reason: to re-tell the events of January 6th Fox-style. But I'm thinking McCarthy likely didn't know that ranking members of congressional committees (that would be Democrats) can also request and receive the same video, because Kevin isn't a guy who does his homework - not to mention he's pretty stupid. If I'm the Dems, I'm putting together a "misinformation war room" of sorts, ready to counter what is almost certainly going to be a distortion of the facts from that day on the part of TC by inviting every major news outlet and fact-checkers to review accurate, in-context information and video. I think you nose just grew a foot Pinocchio. Bi-partisan? Where they kicked off Jim Jordan and left crying Adam and Liz Cheney? Oh my god....this has to be one of your most stupid posts ever. FYI apnews.com/article/joe-biden-capitol-siege-bills-government-and-politics-68f90cb992a1cff1ff3f96009e44050e |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 15:33:14 GMT -5
I think you nose just grew a foot Pinocchio. Bi-partisan? Where they kicked off Jim Jordan and left crying Adam and Liz Cheney? Oh my god....this has to be one of your most stupid posts ever. Jim Jordan was never kicked off the 1/6 committee. He was never accepted on it. Jordan should have never been a part of it. As a matter of fact Republican leadership refused a bipartisan committee. don't call it bi-partisan because it was not and yes morons...they released the footage they wanted to release. You people are so dishonest. |
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 15:35:50 GMT -5
Jim Jordan was never kicked off the 1/6 committee. He was never accepted on it. Jordan should have never been a part of it. As a matter of fact Republican leadership refused a bipartisan committee. don't call it bi-partisan because it was not and yes morons...they released the footage they wanted to release. You people are so dishonest. I can call the 1/6 committee bipartisan BECAUSE it was just that, bipartisan. Sorry you don’t know what that means. |
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Feb 23, 2023 15:37:41 GMT -5
Nancy Pelosi had nothing to do with releasing video, you nitwit. The bipartisan 1/6 committee released video - after, I should add, having it reviewed by the Capital Police to ensure security wasn't compromised. I can pretty much guarantee that Tucker Carlson will not apply any such safeguards. It's patently obvious what's happening here. McCarthy handed over the video to Tucker Carlson for one reason: to re-tell the events of January 6th Fox-style. But I'm thinking McCarthy likely didn't know that ranking members of congressional committees (that would be Democrats) can also request and receive the same video, because Kevin isn't a guy who does his homework - not to mention he's pretty stupid. If I'm the Dems, I'm putting together a "misinformation war room" of sorts, ready to counter what is almost certainly going to be a distortion of the facts from that day on the part of TC by inviting every major news outlet and fact-checkers to review accurate, in-context information and video. I think you nose just grew a foot Pinocchio. Bi-partisan? Where they kicked off Jim Jordan and left crying Adam and Liz Cheney? Oh my god....this has to be one of your most stupid posts ever. Actually, you brought up another massive f**k-up by McCarthy - his petulant refusal to seat any Republicans on the 1/6 committee. Anyway, let's also note that you focused on one small item while ignoring the actual subject matter. Shocking! |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 15:41:06 GMT -5
I think you nose just grew a foot Pinocchio. Bi-partisan? Where they kicked off Jim Jordan and left crying Adam and Liz Cheney? Oh my god....this has to be one of your most stupid posts ever. Actually, you brought up another massive f**k-up by McCarthy - his petulant refusal to seat any Republicans on the 1/6 committee. Anyway, let's also note that you focused on one small item while ignoring the actual subject matter. Shocking! sorry..to call the train wreck of a committee bi-partisan is like calling Fox news bi-partisan because of Brett Baier. |
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Feb 23, 2023 15:43:31 GMT -5
Actually, you brought up another massive f**k-up by McCarthy - his petulant refusal to seat any Republicans on the 1/6 committee. Anyway, let's also note that you focused on one small item while ignoring the actual subject matter. Shocking! sorry..to call the train wreck of a committee bi-partisan is like calling Fox news bi-partisan because of Brett Baier. Enh, keep throwing a hissy fit if you want. I don't care. |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 15:44:32 GMT -5
sorry..to call the train wreck of a committee bi-partisan is like calling Fox news bi-partisan because of Brett Baier. I don't care. if you didn't care you wouldn't respond genius....lord....go get a grande |
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Feb 23, 2023 15:53:51 GMT -5
Actually, you brought up another massive f**k-up by McCarthy - his petulant refusal to seat any Republicans on the 1/6 committee. Anyway, let's also note that you focused on one small item while ignoring the actual subject matter. Shocking! sorry..to call the train wreck of a committee bi-partisan is like calling Fox news bi-partisan because of Brett Baier. The avalanche of evidence uncovered and organized by the 1/6 committee is overwhelming. That’s why you can’t refute facts and only can distract. |
|
|
|
Post by vbman100 on Feb 23, 2023 17:15:43 GMT -5
The activities leading to 9 people dead from the actions of that day is not “going to be great”. The only person that was dead from that incident it was a unarmed woman shot because she broke a window. If that was the rule of law then about one million liberals should’ve been shot during the rioting after George Floyd.Don’t be a liar. Nobody likes a liar If someone broke a window trying to break into your house to steal from you, kidnap you, kill you, and you shot them dead, would you claim self defense and that you had the right to do so, or would you think, oh my gosh, I just killed someone for breaking my window? |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 17:38:10 GMT -5
The only person that was dead from that incident it was a unarmed woman shot because she broke a window. If that was the rule of law then about one million liberals should’ve been shot during the rioting after George Floyd.Don’t be a liar. Nobody likes a liar If someone broke a window trying to break into your house to steal from you, kidnap you, kill you, and you shot them dead, would you claim self defense and that you had the right to do so, or would you think, oh my gosh, I just killed someone for breaking my window? so you are saying that anyone who broke a window during the rioting should have been shot and killed? A democrat tough on the law. Call the coast guard. |
|
|
|
Post by vbman100 on Feb 23, 2023 21:05:02 GMT -5
If someone broke a window trying to break into your house to steal from you, kidnap you, kill you, and you shot them dead, would you claim self defense and that you had the right to do so, or would you think, oh my gosh, I just killed someone for breaking my window? so you are saying that anyone who broke a window during the rioting should have been shot and killed? A democrat tough on the law. Call the coast guard. No, you are. That’s how you framed what happened. “An unarmed person broke a window and was shot and killed.” Of course it was not that simple, but you like to think so. |
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Feb 23, 2023 21:14:53 GMT -5
so you are saying that anyone who broke a window during the rioting should have been shot and killed? A democrat tough on the law. Call the coast guard. No, you are. That’s how you framed what happened. “An unarmed person broke a window and was shot and killed.” Of course it was not that simple, but you like to think so. thats exactly what happened by the officer that had a bad habit of leaving his firearm in bathrooms,etc. |
|
