|
Post by genisvel on May 28, 2024 14:52:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on May 31, 2024 17:37:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by genisvel on May 31, 2024 19:18:29 GMT -5
@ 5:46 Courtney Schwan is committed to PVF for 2025 @ 8:28 Possibly changing tie-breaker formula. Specifically to include number of 5 setters played. @ 19:23 Possible playoff format changes. Also @ 19:23 and continued at 34:48, teams contemplating venue change. @ 23:42 says she's soliciting player feedback. @ 24:56 Successes she wants to replicate and improvements she'd like to make.
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on May 31, 2024 19:22:44 GMT -5
@ 8:28 Possibly changing tie-breaker formula. Specifically to include number of 5 setters played. @ 19:23 Possible playoff format changes. Also @ 19:23 and continued at 34:48, teams contemplating venue change. 1. seems obvious. Orlando and Columbus had the same W/L but Orlando won 11 more sets than Columbus (And only lost one more) yet finished behind them in the official standings. (luckily it didnt change any of the playoff teams) 2. to more teams? or not single elimination? 3. that's probably needed. although id like to see less monday/tuesday games (id have to look more at Wed/Thu ones). San Diego and Columbus had pretty good attendance on some of the weekend games but otherwise could be quite empty.
|
|
|
Post by genisvel on May 31, 2024 19:34:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by genisvel on May 31, 2024 19:36:12 GMT -5
@ 8:28 Possibly changing tie-breaker formula. Specifically to include number of 5 setters played. @ 19:23 Possible playoff format changes. Also @ 19:23 and continued at 34:48, teams contemplating venue change. 1. seems obvious. Orlando and Columbus had the same W/L but Orlando won 11 more sets than Columbus (And only lost one more) yet finished behind them in the official standings. (luckily it didnt change any of the playoff teams) 2. to more teams? or not single elimination? 3. that's probably needed. although id like to see less monday/tuesday games (id have to look more at Wed/Thu ones). San Diego and Columbus had pretty good attendance on some of the weekend games but otherwise could be quite empty. She mentioned a series of matches. I'm not optimistic. You run into the issue of finishing later again.
|
|
|
Post by n00b on May 31, 2024 21:02:02 GMT -5
1. seems obvious. Orlando and Columbus had the same W/L but Orlando won 11 more sets than Columbus (And only lost one more) yet finished behind them in the official standings. (luckily it didnt change any of the playoff teams) 2. to more teams? or not single elimination? 3. that's probably needed. although id like to see less monday/tuesday games (id have to look more at Wed/Thu ones). San Diego and Columbus had pretty good attendance on some of the weekend games but otherwise could be quite empty. She mentioned a series of matches. I'm not optimistic. You run into the issue of finishing later again. Or they play fewer regular season matches to accommodate a longer postseason.
|
|
|
Post by genisvel on May 31, 2024 22:36:31 GMT -5
She mentioned a series of matches. I'm not optimistic. You run into the issue of finishing later again. Or they play fewer regular season matches to accommodate a longer postseason. Not impossible, but, that's less money per year from ticket sales and in-arena advertising for each individual team.
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jun 3, 2024 17:51:34 GMT -5
So you can’t sign for a whole month? Why
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Jun 3, 2024 17:53:37 GMT -5
So you can’t sign for a whole month? Why Supposedly to even the playing field for the new teams. Not saying it’s a good reason, but I believe that’s why.
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jun 3, 2024 17:55:54 GMT -5
So you can’t sign for a whole month? Why Supposedly to even the playing field for the new teams. Not saying it’s a good reason, but I believe that’s why. well I understand the June 1 date (and think it’s a good idea) for that but not allowing them to actually sign for another month seems bizarre given they’re already so far behind in the VB calendar… they won’t know their roster holes until July at the earliest?
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Jun 3, 2024 18:27:10 GMT -5
Supposedly to even the playing field for the new teams. Not saying it’s a good reason, but I believe that’s why. well I understand the June 1 date (and think it’s a good idea) for that but not allowing them to actually sign for another month seems bizarre given they’re already so far behind in the VB calendar… they won’t know their roster holes until July at the earliest? Lots of spots for this year’s NCAA grads!
|
|
|
Post by genisvel on Jun 3, 2024 18:30:06 GMT -5
Judging from what Pauly said in the video I posted above, it seems teams have players who didn't play this year already signed.
The contracts probably don't become active until the 30th, so they can't be announced yet (N,I, & L rights et al).
The players who played this year are the question marks.
Players who were going to play elsewhere are already gone.
Everyone else, including coaches, players, and fans must embrace the chaos at this point.
Considering the rumors around GR, I'm here for it! 😵💫🥴😁
WE NEED KC, DALLAS, AND INDY COACHES ANNOUNCED!!!
|
|
|
Post by genisvel on Jun 3, 2024 20:19:00 GMT -5
|
|