|
Post by nederlander on Dec 20, 2023 21:33:33 GMT -5
The current policy actually greatly undercuts the previous policy, and makes it much harder for transgender athletes to meet the criteria for qualification. The NCAA also is making a pointed effort to punt policy-making to non NCAA entities, in order to avoid making their own policies, and skirt controversy. To suggest or assert that the NCAA has a clearly established policy of including transgendered-male athletes in womens sports, is distorting the facts. If there is any question about that, there are scores of articles available from (trans-inclusive) advocates that are very much against the policy updates (current NCAA policy). One could easily argue that the policy updates are designed to be exclusive, rather than inclusive.
|
|
|
Post by florfresh on Dec 20, 2023 21:38:02 GMT -5
What role does USAV play here? They have allowed the player to play on the girls side for a number of years. Seems to be cruel and misleading to then not be eligible to continue at the NCAA level. If USAV is going to claim ignorance, should identification become a question as regular as DOB?
|
|
|
Post by OHVBKING on Dec 20, 2023 21:39:18 GMT -5
What is interesting is the overwhelming majority of females playing college athletics are strongly opposed to transgender playing in women's college athletics, yet we have people who have no skin in the game trying to tell the rest of us we are transgender phobic and aholes for voicing our opinions against it. Just a matter of time before there is a Federal Law banning this crap.
|
|
|
Post by OHVBKING on Dec 20, 2023 21:40:11 GMT -5
What role does USAV play here? They have allowed the player to play on the girls side for a number of years. Seems to be cruel and misleading to then not be eligible to continue at the NCAA level. If USAV is going to claim ignorance, should identification become a question as regular as DOB? USAV has no authority over college athletics.
|
|
|
Post by uofaGRAD on Dec 20, 2023 21:43:28 GMT -5
What is interesting is the overwhelming majority of females playing college athletics are strongly opposed to transgender playing in women's college athletics, yet we have people who have no skin in the game trying to tell the rest of us we are transgender phobic and aholes for voicing our opinions against it. Just a matter of time before there is a Federal Law banning this crap. was there a survey conducted?
|
|
|
Post by mervinswerved on Dec 20, 2023 21:44:09 GMT -5
the overwhelming majority of females playing college athletics are strongly opposed to transgender playing in women's college athletics Evidence of this?
|
|
|
Post by florfresh on Dec 20, 2023 21:44:28 GMT -5
Of course they don’t, but creating a pipeline seems to lead to certain conclusions
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Dec 20, 2023 21:51:40 GMT -5
What role does USAV play here? They have allowed the player to play on the girls side for a number of years. Seems to be cruel and misleading to then not be eligible to continue at the NCAA level. If USAV is going to claim ignorance, should identification become a question as regular as DOB? USAV doesn't really "play a role" here, but their policy on transgender athletes is very similar to the NCAA's, FWIW.
|
|
|
Post by luckydawg on Dec 20, 2023 22:01:03 GMT -5
What is interesting is the overwhelming majority of females playing college athletics are strongly opposed to transgender playing in women's college athletics, yet we have people who have no skin in the game trying to tell the rest of us we are transgender phobic and aholes for voicing our opinions against it. Just a matter of time before there is a Federal Law banning this crap. IF that were true, do you really think any college coach would risk messing with team unity and the eventual mass exodus of players? I will make the leap that most coaches have a much better read on what their players think than all VT posters in this thread combined.
|
|
|
Post by Brutus Buckeye on Dec 20, 2023 22:03:46 GMT -5
Which is the preferred nomenclature between epicene and androgynous?
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Dec 20, 2023 22:04:48 GMT -5
What is interesting is the overwhelming majority of females playing college athletics are strongly opposed to transgender playing in women's college athletics, yet we have people who have no skin in the game trying to tell the rest of us we are transgender phobic and aholes for voicing our opinions against it. Just a matter of time before there is a Federal Law banning this crap. IF that were true, do you really think any college coach would risk messing with team unity and the eventual mass exodus of players? I will make the leap that most coaches have a much better read on what their players think than all VT posters in this thread combined. You mean they'd do what Washington supposedly did?
|
|
|
Post by luckydawg on Dec 20, 2023 22:41:05 GMT -5
IF that were true, do you really think any college coach would risk messing with team unity and the eventual mass exodus of players? I will make the leap that most coaches have a much better read on what their players think than all VT posters in this thread combined. You mean they'd do what Washington supposedly did? Only if the players were okay with it.
|
|
|
Post by topspin on Dec 20, 2023 23:06:47 GMT -5
It’s fairly obvious who knows and has worked with female college athletes and who hasn’t. The vast majority accept and love their trans sisters. Some of you don’t realize how many female college athletes are part of the lgbtq community.
Riley Gaines is the exception and is cashing in on naive conservatives. That’s why you know her name. It’s a grift.
|
|
|
Post by staticb on Dec 20, 2023 23:06:53 GMT -5
What is interesting is the overwhelming majority of females playing college athletics are strongly opposed to transgender playing in women's college athletics, yet we have people who have no skin in the game trying to tell the rest of us we are transgender phobic and aholes for voicing our opinions against it. Just a matter of time before there is a Federal Law banning this crap. IF that were true, do you really think any college coach would risk messing with team unity and the eventual mass exodus of players? I will make the leap that most coaches have a much better read on what their players think than all VT posters in this thread combined. Why would their players even have to know?
|
|
|
Post by staticb on Dec 20, 2023 23:10:08 GMT -5
Co-ed and women’s volleyball is two different things in my opinion. Yeah co-ed is a choice. Biological males playing in a women’s league is not a choice for biological women who oppose it besides choosing not to play Right but forbidding your daughter from playing with or against a person just because you don't like a physical characteristic about them?!?!? Do you not see how that's transphobic and not merely "I think trans women have too big of a competitive advantage"
|
|