|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Oct 14, 2024 15:17:49 GMT -5
Interesting............................ Phoebe deserves this, don’t take that away from us! Oh no, hands down Phoebe should be DPOW. Without question. Mimi deserves POTW too! |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Oct 14, 2024 15:19:55 GMT -5
Phoebe deserves this, don’t take that away from us! I don't think that's what he's suggesting  Setter A - 11.9 aps (TEAM: .268), 3.8 dps Setter B - 12.1 aps (TEAM: .258), 2.7 dps Setter C - 11.5 aps (TEAM: .392), 1.00 bps, 3.00 dps Which do you pick? A - Bergen Reilly
B - Izzy Starck (FRESHMAN)
C - Melani Shaffmaster  |
|
|
|
Post by maigrey on Oct 14, 2024 15:22:27 GMT -5
I don't think that's what he's suggesting Setter A - 11.9 aps (TEAM: .268), 3.8 dps Setter B - 12.1 aps (TEAM: .258), 2.7 dps Setter C - 11.5 aps (TEAM: .392), 1.00 bps, 3.00 dps Which do you pick? A - Bergen Reilly
B - Izzy Starck (FRESHMAN)
C - Melani Shaffmaster I mean, you can make justifications for either setter B (highest aps) or setter C (Highest team %, plus pretty close aps), but the only stat setter QA wins is ... digs per set? When was that a primary setter statistic? |
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Oct 14, 2024 15:34:37 GMT -5
Phoebe deserves this, don’t take that away from us! I don't think that's what he's suggesting :) Setter A - 11.9 aps (TEAM: .268), 3.8 dps Setter B - 12.1 aps (TEAM: .258), 2.7 dps Setter C - 11.5 aps (TEAM: .392), 1.00 bps, 3.00 dps Which do you pick? A - Bergen Reilly
B - Izzy Starck (FRESHMAN)
C - Melani Shaffmaster The one who beat a top 10 opponent. |
|
|
|
Post by skolgophers on Oct 14, 2024 15:37:18 GMT -5
I mean, you can make justifications for either setter B (highest aps) or setter C (Highest team %, plus pretty close aps), but the only stat setter QA wins is ... digs per set? When was that a primary setter statistic? Whoever picks these awards hates Mel. She’s had some incredible matches and keeps getting overlooked. |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Oct 14, 2024 15:40:53 GMT -5
I don't think that's what he's suggesting Setter A - 11.9 aps (TEAM: .268), 3.8 dps Setter B - 12.1 aps (TEAM: .258), 2.7 dps Setter C - 11.5 aps (TEAM: .392), 1.00 bps, 3.00 dps Which do you pick? A - Bergen Reilly
B - Izzy Starck (FRESHMAN)
C - Melani Shaffmaster The one who beat a top 10 opponent. You're not allowed to cheat like that on a blind resume!  |
|
|
|
Post by BigDigEnergy on Oct 14, 2024 15:54:16 GMT -5
Big Ten awards, Oct 14, 2024:  OPOW: Mimi Colyer, Oregon DPOW: Phoebe Awoleye, Minnesota SOW: Bergen Reilly, Nebraska FOW: Izzy Starck, Penn State I need to look at Reilly stats but I think Mel definitely deserves it. Oh well... |
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Oct 14, 2024 15:54:30 GMT -5
The one who beat a top 10 opponent. You're not allowed to cheat like that on a blind resume! (rofl) My greater point is that setter stats don't really matter all that much. Rachel Fairbanks is behind a whole bunch of setters in assists/set because Pitt is 4th in the country in aces per set and 17th in blocks per set so she doesn't get as many opportunities for assists. What matters is being subjectively good and leading your team to quality wins. Whichever setter has done that gets the nod. |
|
|
|
Post by photos1 on Oct 14, 2024 16:27:49 GMT -5
Big Ten awards, Oct 14, 2024: OPOW: Mimi Colyer, Oregon DPOW: Phoebe Awoleye, Minnesota SOW: Bergen Reilly, Nebraska FOW: Izzy Starck, Penn State I need to look at Reilly stats but I think Mel definitely deserves it. Oh well... Seriously? Just the competition alone favored Reilly. Reilly had more assists/set and more dig/set. These weekly awards mean little to nothing. Maybe they mean more to someone like Shaffmaster because if things continue as they are she won't make any of the season ending all-B1G awards lists-she certainly isn’t even one of the top six or seven best B1G setters. 🏐 |
|
|
|
Post by skolgophers on Oct 14, 2024 16:38:36 GMT -5
I need to look at Reilly stats but I think Mel definitely deserves it. Oh well... Seriously? Just the competition alone favored Reilly. Reilly had more assists/set and more dig/set. These weekly awards mean little to nothing. Maybe they mean more to someone like Shaffmaster because if things continue as they are she won't make any of the season ending all-B1G awards lists-she certainly isn’t even one of the top six or seven best B1G setters. 🏐 Hot take |
|
trojansc
Legend
All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017), All-VolleyTalk 2nd Team (2016), 2021, 2019 Fantasy League Champion, 2020 Fantasy League Runner Up, 2022 2nd Runner Up
Posts: 31,195 
|
Post by trojansc on Oct 14, 2024 16:39:27 GMT -5
The one who beat a top 10 opponent. You're not allowed to cheat like that on a blind resume! People in blind resume challenges often put together what matches their agendas. |
|
|
|
Post by BigDigEnergy on Oct 14, 2024 17:15:13 GMT -5
Seriously? Just the competition alone favored Reilly. Reilly had more assists/set and more dig/set. These weekly awards mean little to nothing. Maybe they mean more to someone like Shaffmaster because if things continue as they are she won't make any of the season ending all-B1G awards lists-she certainly isn’t even one of the top six or seven best B1G setters. 🏐 Hot take I learned not to respond to that poster haha 😆 |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Oct 14, 2024 19:29:19 GMT -5
You're not allowed to cheat like that on a blind resume! My greater point is that setter stats don't really matter all that much. Rachel Fairbanks is behind a whole bunch of setters in assists/set because Pitt is 4th in the country in aces per set and 17th in blocks per set so she doesn't get as many opportunities for assists. What matters is being subjectively good and leading your team to quality wins. Whichever setter has done that gets the nod. Oh no, I got it. And I agree with your point. I was just pulling your leg. |
|
|
|
Post by bruinsgold on Oct 14, 2024 19:31:08 GMT -5
You're not allowed to cheat like that on a blind resume! People in blind resume challenges often put together what matches their agendas. Well I obviously need to do that more because whenever I do your Bracketology blind resumes, I'm always like "huh points were made!" when I see who's who at the bottom. |
|
|
|
Post by maigrey on Oct 14, 2024 19:37:13 GMT -5
You're not allowed to cheat like that on a blind resume! People in blind resume challenges often put together what matches their agendas. I just copied and pasted all the setters that were listed in the Big ten POW post, to be fair. I just didn't post Charlie/Jenna because their stats weren't as good as the three I did post. Edit: ok, I didn't post the opponents, because then that wouldn't have been a blind choice. |
|
