|
Post by vup on Oct 5, 2014 3:32:12 GMT -5
Yes, I think he is generally well liked among Husker fans. 2 time Coach of the Year, 2 time National Champs, 10 conference titles, and holds a 422-52 (.890) record in 15 seasons with Nebraska. Not to mention the in-state home winning streak that spanned 5 seasons, the current sellout streak of over 200, the Devaney Center renovation, and coaching the likes of numerous former and current members of Team USA. His reception is more favorable than any of our Football coaches (Pelini, Papuchis (DC), Beck(OC)). The most popular Husker coach right now is probably Tim Miles (men's bball). Erstad (baseball), Yori (women's bball) and Revelle (softball) are also liked. Cook, however, has been with Nebraska longer any other Husker coach, except Rhonda Revelle, and he is far and away the most decorated and celebrated current Head Coach at Nebraska. Accolades aside, I personally like him a lot-- as a coach and as a person. He knows the game of volleyball, and I think he offers some unique perspective. His philosophy is not centered around stats or moneyball, but rather more of just having fun together as a team. He has said in the past that "there are more important things in life than volleyball", and I really appreciate that he communicates that with us. It's good to be reminded of the bigger picture of life, and I think he understands that... He is an inspiration to many of the kids growing up in Nebraska, and he is very passionate about helping people live their dreams. He has huge heart for the State of Nebraska. He is a True Husker, and for that, I am very proud of him. I assumed there might be many different opinions of him within the fan base. Your posts was particularly interesting. When reading your first paragraph I was thinking, this person likes him because he's been so successful, which would be fair enough. However, you wrote a second paragraph about the personal qualities you believe he possesses. I have seen very few Nebraska games because I just discovered this season that I have the Big 10 channel on my TV.....don't know how I missed that one. Having seen so few I didn't have a picture of how he's received by fans. I have read plenty of criticism of him but it's been primarily by fans of opposing teams and so that's taken with a grain of salt. One common theme is his behavior during games and what is often termed as arrogant. Is that not a behavior you have noticed? What I found most interesting about your post was stating that he puts an emphasis on the team having fun together. I keep reading about there possibly being team chemistry issues and if that is at all accurate, I tend to assume it's a coaching issue if it's an ongoing problem. Do you think the team chemistry rumors are just that, rumors? This is the first I have read anyone talking about him being a coach that emphasizes fun. Is this fairly well-known? Or do you have more of an inside look into the team and know a different side to him? I'm assuming from your comment about appreciating him "sharing this with us" that this occurred at chalk talks and/or banquets? I'm always interested in longstanding coaches that have been with very successful programs. While I might hate when Russ Rose beats Stanford, he's another coach that interests me. There are only two coaches that bother me and neither are Cook or Rose. No, I do not have an inside look on the team. My comment about him communicating with us was in reference to the various interviews he does. I don't know where you "keep reading" about Nebraska having chemistry issues, but if you're talking about volleytalk, I saw that topic brought up once, and then it was nailed in the coffin-- and I have been reading every Husker related post this season. Nebraska's chemistry this year is good. The team seems to enjoy, like, and respect each other very well. Yes, it is well known that Cook has been emphasizing fun, in particular, since the '08 season.
|
|
|
Post by oldmanred on Oct 5, 2014 7:50:36 GMT -5
I think chemistry is something that is worked on every time a new group of recruits come in; getting to know and trust each other is important part of team unity!
GO HUSKERS
|
|
|
Post by Huskerhawk on Oct 5, 2014 8:28:06 GMT -5
JC coaches one of the best volleyball teams in the nation but you wouldn't know it by watching him court side. His court did demeanor suggests that he isn't enjoying it or that he even likes his team. I would think he'd be a lot more successful recruiting if he were more positive during matches. I wouldn't want to send my daughter to play for him. Wow... What the #$%^ are you talking about? His stoic personality has always been one of his trademark characteristics. Because it has always been makes it endearing quality?
|
|
|
Post by courtside on Oct 5, 2014 9:25:40 GMT -5
Any chance there is a link to a replay available for the match?
|
|
|
Post by tclenpsu1 on Oct 5, 2014 10:04:56 GMT -5
Any chance there is a link to a replay available for the match? You can watch replay @ btn2go.com
|
|
|
Post by Phillytom on Oct 5, 2014 10:08:21 GMT -5
This in a nutshell is what is so great about the B1G. The coaching is so excellent at so many programs, if you have a weakness they will find it and teach their teams to exploit it. And then you (meaning, today, Penn State) have to go back to the gym and fix your weakness and sharpen your strengths. And then the overall level of competition just ratchets higher and higher. The players once they get a couple of years experience in the conference get so savvy -- they know all the tricks, and you can't get away with anything cheap. I always root for PSU to win every match of course but matches like this underscore how good the league is. Regardless of what other fans say, PSU didn't lose this match, Nebraska WON it with beautiful and savvy play. John Cook is a wonderful coach and he has taught his young team really well. PSU played lights out against Wisconsin, had an extremely well developed game plan and overwhelmed the Badgers. Too bad they don't play again because Wisky would be a completely different team the second time. PSU-Minnesota, while on the surface it was a sweep, anybody who watched that game could see what a tough match it was. There were significant stretches where Minnesota was DOMINATING; they just couldn't keep the consistency. The Nebraska match -- after that first set the Huskers settled in and played their game with incredible concentration and tenacity. I've always thought the world of the Rolfzens -- the sky is the limit for them. And this was a big step for their development as leaders of the Nebraska team. (Just a little aside here, but the the volleyball world is going to be hearing a lot the next 2 1/2 seasons from both B1G sets of twins -- the Rolfzens and the Tapps.) So do I take away from this win by Nebraska...to beat Penn State step no.1 is deny Micha's dumps, regardless of what blocking sacrifices a team has to make. Apparently, denying Micha her dumps messes with her confidence and causes her to become less effective at serving and setting. Step no.2 is to play lights out backcourt defense. I don't know what the other steps are...maybe pray that PSU is a bit off their game. Step 3) Serve Frantti. Nebraska seemed to be targeting her most of the night and, although she could transition for the attack, she struggled to pass well consistently. I am sure it's partly just being a freshman in that environment but it helped keep Micha from getting swings at the ball.
|
|
|
Post by courtside on Oct 5, 2014 11:04:21 GMT -5
Any chance there is a link to a replay available for the match? You can watch replay @ btn2go.com thanks, but I don't have the proper subscription. Is anyone able to put it on youtube?
|
|
|
Post by sportsfun on Oct 5, 2014 16:09:02 GMT -5
I assumed there might be many different opinions of him within the fan base. Your posts was particularly interesting. When reading your first paragraph I was thinking, this person likes him because he's been so successful, which would be fair enough. However, you wrote a second paragraph about the personal qualities you believe he possesses. I have seen very few Nebraska games because I just discovered this season that I have the Big 10 channel on my TV.....don't know how I missed that one. Having seen so few I didn't have a picture of how he's received by fans. I have read plenty of criticism of him but it's been primarily by fans of opposing teams and so that's taken with a grain of salt. One common theme is his behavior during games and what is often termed as arrogant. Is that not a behavior you have noticed? What I found most interesting about your post was stating that he puts an emphasis on the team having fun together. I keep reading about there possibly being team chemistry issues and if that is at all accurate, I tend to assume it's a coaching issue if it's an ongoing problem. Do you think the team chemistry rumors are just that, rumors? This is the first I have read anyone talking about him being a coach that emphasizes fun. Is this fairly well-known? Or do you have more of an inside look into the team and know a different side to him? I'm assuming from your comment about appreciating him "sharing this with us" that this occurred at chalk talks and/or banquets? I'm always interested in longstanding coaches that have been with very successful programs. While I might hate when Russ Rose beats Stanford, he's another coach that interests me. There are only two coaches that bother me and neither are Cook or Rose. No, I do not have an inside look on the team. My comment about him communicating with us was in reference to the various interviews he does. I don't know where you "keep reading" about Nebraska having chemistry issues, but if you're talking about volleytalk, I saw that topic brought up once, and then it was nailed in the coffin-- and I have been reading every Husker related post this season. Nebraska's chemistry this year is good. The team seems to enjoy, like, and respect each other very well. Yes, it is well known that Cook has been emphasizing fun, in particular, since the '08 season. Yes, I have read about the supposed chemistry issues here on VT. I don't read articles about Cook because I don't follow the team closely enough. There were several posts over the past three seasons. It very well could be an issue of Cook once stating that chemistry is an important aspect of the game and people read into it and made faulty assumptions. There seems to be a pattern of taking anything Cook says and putting it in the worst possible light by some who don't like him and that is why I asked if you noticed this being an issue or rather if you think it's a baseless rumor? I have no interest in criticizing the guy and am simply interested in how he is received by fans of the team.
|
|
|
Post by smb4 on Oct 6, 2014 15:08:06 GMT -5
I have a question for Huskers only fans and it's not intended to start an argument. I'm truly curious. Do most Huskers fans like John Cook? I'm not going to be dishonest and state he's one of my favorite coaches. I like the fans and how could I dislike any of the college players but Cook simply isn't one of my favorite coaches (not me least favorite though). It's entirely possible to like and support a team without liking the coach and so I'm wondering what is the general sentiment towards Cook amongst the fans? I wonder if all the outside bashing (much of it quite mean and over-dramatized) causes fans to rally around him and defend him or rather they are also a bit annoyed by him? I imagine the fact that he's been quite successful would make him endearing to a lot of fans. I'm not looking for people outside of Huskers fans to answer this question because the bashing of Cook by fans of other teams has been done to death. I'm late to this conversation, but I'll weigh in. I am just a fan - no inside contacts - but I like Cook. I understand that he looks like a sourpuss on the sidelines, but I think it is telling that many graduates come back to workout with the team or to serve as assistants. I don't think the look on his face is indicative of any deep character flaw. The people who work with him (athletes and coaches) seem to like and respect him. I'm sure there are people who have worked or interacted with him who don't like him, but, really, isn't that true of everyone? From a fan's perspective, in his interviews he comes off as thoughtful, passionate about women's college volleyball and Nebraska (state-wide) volleyball. He shows concern for the players beyond their athletic prowess. He's even funny in a sometimes awkward, introvert-like way.
|
|
|
Post by stand on Oct 6, 2014 15:41:31 GMT -5
I never understood Cook's negative image. Just because someone looks like he is pissed-off all the time doesn't mean that he actually is pissed-off. Maybe he is. Maybe he isn't. In this game both Cook and Rose were jawing at the refs (justifiably), and I have never heard anyone call Rose a d-bag.
If a coach breaks a verbal commitment or yanks a scholarship or cuts an entire roster, I think they are open for criticism. But to say Cook should smile more? Who cares? He gets plenty of players, he doesn't need to smile for the fans.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Oct 6, 2014 16:40:59 GMT -5
No matter how I say this, its going to make me sound a little perverted but......Here is the fascination with John Cook in my opinion. He is tall, dark, handsome, and very successful. He is also a bit of a mystery. I know the female fans like him alot, but he is also a character that many dislike because subconsciously people don't think that anyone deserves to have that much going for them. Rose has been more successful but people do not obsess about him the way they do Cook. John also has that devil may care persona that makes him even more appealing to love/hate. He also tells the truth at times whether it is politically incorrect or not.
|
|
|
Post by sportsfun on Oct 6, 2014 17:09:16 GMT -5
I have a question for Huskers only fans and it's not intended to start an argument. I'm truly curious. Do most Huskers fans like John Cook? I'm not going to be dishonest and state he's one of my favorite coaches. I like the fans and how could I dislike any of the college players but Cook simply isn't one of my favorite coaches (not me least favorite though). It's entirely possible to like and support a team without liking the coach and so I'm wondering what is the general sentiment towards Cook amongst the fans? I wonder if all the outside bashing (much of it quite mean and over-dramatized) causes fans to rally around him and defend him or rather they are also a bit annoyed by him? I imagine the fact that he's been quite successful would make him endearing to a lot of fans. I'm not looking for people outside of Huskers fans to answer this question because the bashing of Cook by fans of other teams has been done to death. I'm late to this conversation, but I'll weigh in. I am just a fan - no inside contacts - but I like Cook. I understand that he looks like a sourpuss on the sidelines, but I think it is telling that many graduates come back to workout with the team or to serve as assistants. I don't think the look on his face is indicative of any deep character flaw. The people who work with him (athletes and coaches) seem to like and respect him. I'm sure there are people who have worked or interacted with him who don't like him, but, really, isn't that true of everyone? From a fan's perspective, in his interviews he comes off as thoughtful, passionate about women's college volleyball and Nebraska (state-wide) volleyball. He shows concern for the players beyond their athletic prowess. He's even funny in a sometimes awkward, introvert-like way. You brought up one of the strongest indicators of who a coach really is, whether or not his/her former athletes come back after the four years. I look for whether athletes continue a relationship with the coach or not. Not just attend some games because it's their alma mater but if they continue contact with the coach. It's telling if indeed Cook has good relationships with a lot of his former players.
|
|
|
Post by sportsfun on Oct 6, 2014 17:17:48 GMT -5
No matter how I say this, its going to make me sound a little perverted but......Here is the fascination with John Cook in my opinion. He is tall, dark, handsome, and very successful. He is also a bit of a mystery. I know the female fans like him alot, but he is also a character that many dislike because subconsciously people don't think that anyone deserves to have that much going for them. Rose has been more successful but people do not obsess about him the way they do Cook. John also has that devil may care persona that makes him even more appealing to love/hate. He also tells the truth at times whether it is politically incorrect or not. It doesn't sound remotely perverted and it's nice to see when a man is confident enough about himself to positively comment on the looks of another man. I didn't realize he is commonly thought of as particularly handsome amongst the female fan base. Huh! Maybe he's just not my type but is the type of many other females. As far as Rose not being obsessed about, I think he takes a lot of criticism. I'm not sure why, other than it's such a pain to have him and his team beat our teams year after year, but he does take a great deal of heat from a lot of people.
|
|
|
Post by smb4 on Oct 6, 2014 17:31:04 GMT -5
No matter how I say this, its going to make me sound a little perverted but......Here is the fascination with John Cook in my opinion. He is tall, dark, handsome, and very successful. He is also a bit of a mystery. I know the female fans like him alot, but he is also a character that many dislike because subconsciously people don't think that anyone deserves to have that much going for them. Rose has been more successful but people do not obsess about him the way they do Cook. John also has that devil may care persona that makes him even more appealing to love/hate. He also tells the truth at times whether it is politically incorrect or not. It doesn't sound remotely perverted and it's nice to see when a man is confident enough about himself to positively comment on the looks of another man. I didn't realize he is commonly thought of as particularly handsome amongst the female fan base. Huh! Maybe he's just not my type but is the type of many other females. As far as Rose not being obsessed about, I think he takes a lot of criticism. I'm not sure why, other than it's such a pain to have him and his team beat our teams year after year, but he does take a great deal of heat from a lot of people. I didn't realize people had that image of Cook either - it's not something that's ever come up in my conversations with fans (or anyone else). As I said before, I like Cook as a coach, but that has nothing to do with his appearance. Who (other than the poster who started the thread about hottest coaching staffs) cares about what the coach looks like?
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 6, 2014 17:33:14 GMT -5
No matter how I say this, its going to make me sound a little perverted but......Here is the fascination with John Cook in my opinion. He is tall, dark, handsome, and very successful. He is also a bit of a mystery. I know the female fans like him alot, but he is also a character that many dislike because subconsciously people don't think that anyone deserves to have that much going for them. Rose has been more successful but people do not obsess about him the way they do Cook. John also has that devil may care persona that makes him even more appealing to love/hate. He also tells the truth at times whether it is politically incorrect or not. It doesn't sound remotely perverted and it's nice to see when a man is confident enough about himself to positively comment on the looks of another man. I didn't realize he is commonly thought of as particularly handsome amongst the female fan base. Huh! Maybe he's just not my type but is the type of many other females. As far as Rose not being obsessed about, I think he takes a lot of criticism. I'm not sure why, other than it's such a pain to have him and his team beat our teams year after year, but he does take a great deal of heat from a lot of people. Let me put it this way: I think I would enjoy going out to dinner with Russ Rose. I have my doubts about the same with John Cook. But certainly I could be wrong, I don't actually know either of them.
|
|