|
Post by Fight On! on Feb 20, 2018 23:40:28 GMT -5
Any word on how Hansen played? Was Schirmer there?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 23:57:35 GMT -5
Can anyone explain to me why Munciana passes the ball so low and fast to the net sometimes? I feel like it can be a problem for their setters at times That's Muncie volleyball. They run as much as possible through the middle of the court.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 23:58:57 GMT -5
I actually think her hands and location looked rather smooth in that championship match. I didn't watch any other of the their matches this past weekend because I've already seen all of these players enough. Shaffmaster looks improved over last year, which is all you can REALLY hope for, right? I mean, she's still two years out from college play. I'm not saying she's going to be the next Carlini, and last year I didn't think her setting brought much to the team, but I think next year will be a strong indication of where she's going as a setter if Munciana goes in a 5-1 with her after all these 18's graduate. She was pretty darn good against Aspire in the semis. Sorry, I disagree. I think both Muncie setters are much better attackers than setters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 23:59:24 GMT -5
How did the sophomore setter for Legacy play She was outstanding. She's much, much better than Shaffmaster.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2018 0:02:21 GMT -5
Her size makes that middle set really fast in transition. I would actually like to see them run a 5-1, with Parker hitting out of the backrow and Shaff able to turn on 2. I don't think Parker's setting is as good as her hitting and vice-versa. If you're going to have a 6-3+ girl set, I've never understood doing it back row only. right!? Like Ashley freaking Engle. A 6'3" lefty, and you only have her setting through the back row. Smh.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2018 1:09:21 GMT -5
Definitely helped that Munci took Miller out in the front row, and put in the junior outside. Well, Miller played all six rotations in all three sets. Lingenfelter only took her out for her front row rotations near the end of the third when they had serve. She subbed right back in for SR. It would be hard to say that the other OH made a difference.
|
|
|
Post by jasonr on Feb 21, 2018 8:59:16 GMT -5
How did the sophomore setter for Legacy play She was outstanding. She's much, much better than Shaffmaster. Michigan State commit?
|
|
|
Post by cardinalvolleyball on Feb 21, 2018 9:11:20 GMT -5
She was outstanding. She's much, much better than Shaffmaster. Michigan State commit? yep
|
|
|
Post by vbfamily on Feb 21, 2018 10:36:48 GMT -5
How did the sophomore setter for Legacy play She was outstanding. She's much, much better than Shaffmaster. Shaffmaster was very good setting both times when we played her. Location was great, tight passes no problem with her length, thinking overpass...nope. She is elite and only a sophomore. Legacy setter was great too, so not taking anything away from her. Also, Muncie running a straight 6-2 to keep them both getting reps setting in club makes sense. They are winning with it so why not. Nice thing is, with the lineup they can change to a 5-1 in an instant because both she and Parker will never leave the court.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2018 13:30:18 GMT -5
She was outstanding. She's much, much better than Shaffmaster. Michigan State commit? I think that's unfair. I've been critical/complimentary of recruits regardless of their commitments. I don't think Shaffmaster is as good, and I've been underwhelmed with her development. That has nothing to do with the fact that another sophomore setter committed to MSU. I don't think Muncie does a great job training setters. I think their system allows them to be successful at the junior level, but I don't think their kids are as prepared to make the jump to college ball and be successful, and I see that happening with Shaffmaster. Watching them play side-by-side in the 18s final, I found the Legacy setter to be more dynamic, take more risks, make better choices, make less errors, & communicate and lead more effectively. I think she's being prepared to be a B1G setter more than Shaffmaster is currently. Just my impression at this point in their careers.
|
|
|
Post by jasonr on Feb 21, 2018 13:31:37 GMT -5
I think that's unfair. I've been critical/complimentary of recruits regardless of their commitments. I don't think Shaffmaster is as good, and I've been underwhelmed with her development. That has nothing to do with the fact that another sophomore setter committed to MSU. I don't think Muncie does a great job training setters. I think their system allows them to be successful at the junior level, but I don't think their kids are as prepared to make the jump to college ball and be successful, and I see that happening with Shaffmaster. Watching them play side-by-side in the 18s final, I found the Legacy setter to be more dynamic, take more risks, make better choices, make less errors, & communicate and lead more effectively. I think she's being prepared to be a B1G setter more than Shaffmaster is currently. Just my impression at this point in their careers. I think you read too much into my post. I was just asking. Couldn't remember who Cullen committed to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2018 13:32:35 GMT -5
She was outstanding. She's much, much better than Shaffmaster. Also, Muncie running a straight 6-2 to keep them both getting reps setting in club makes sense. They are winning with it so why not. Nice thing is, with the lineup they can change to a 5-1 in an instant because both she and Parker will never leave the court. Just because you can run it doesn't mean you have to. Lots of examples of that being true. And yes, they can, and they often have to in rotations 3 and 6 because of the S-MB-OH configuration that they run.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2018 13:33:33 GMT -5
I think that's unfair. I've been critical/complimentary of recruits regardless of their commitments. I don't think Shaffmaster is as good, and I've been underwhelmed with her development. That has nothing to do with the fact that another sophomore setter committed to MSU. I don't think Muncie does a great job training setters. I think their system allows them to be successful at the junior level, but I don't think their kids are as prepared to make the jump to college ball and be successful, and I see that happening with Shaffmaster. Watching them play side-by-side in the 18s final, I found the Legacy setter to be more dynamic, take more risks, make better choices, make less errors, & communicate and lead more effectively. I think she's being prepared to be a B1G setter more than Shaffmaster is currently. Just my impression at this point in their careers. I think you read too much into my post. I was just asking. Couldn't remember who Cullen committed to. I might have, but that's the reason c4ndle liked it. Just wanted to make sure I clarified.
|
|
|
Post by vbfamily on Feb 21, 2018 15:04:05 GMT -5
Also, Muncie running a straight 6-2 to keep them both getting reps setting in club makes sense. They are winning with it so why not. Nice thing is, with the lineup they can change to a 5-1 in an instant because both she and Parker will never leave the court. Just because you can run it doesn't mean you have to. Lots of examples of that being true. And yes, they can, and they often have to in rotations 3 and 6 because of the S-MB-OH configuration that they run. Nope, they certainly don't. But yes, the middle follow setter has some challenges, however, their serve receive pattern with that lineup in a couple rotations requires teams to take an extra look. Anyway, a very good team of talented kids.
|
|
|
Post by azvolleydad on Feb 21, 2018 16:33:44 GMT -5
Just because you can run it doesn't mean you have to. Lots of examples of that being true. And yes, they can, and they often have to in rotations 3 and 6 because of the S-MB-OH configuration that they run. Nope, they certainly don't. But yes, the middle follow setter has some challenges, however, their serve receive pattern with that lineup in a couple rotations requires teams to take an extra look. Anyway, a very good team of talented kids. Agreed. And their bumping and spiking were awesome.
|
|