Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2023 13:44:57 GMT -5
Thank you! And this is the 1 out 100 chance, right? Or more prevalent than 1%? No. That is much more rare worldwide than 1%. By itself. But in one particular genepool in the DR it is common enough that new parents of phenotypical girls are aware that it might happen. The 1% number quoted probably referred to all the different types of intersexuality (and there are many, because human development is very complex) lumped into one total. And of course there can also be just simple clerical mistakes. If a person is "assigned at birth to be male" because of a typo, does that somehow make them a 'biological male' for the rest of their life? I think any reasonable person would say no, although it is the kind of thing that shows up in satirical comedy a lot. Ah I see. I hope that clerical mistakes can be fixed upon noticing the error. Especially with the sex of a person.
|
|